新自由主义、金融危机与资本主义模式的调整——美国模式、日本模式和瑞典模式的比较

发布时间：2018-02-08 12:27

本文关键词： 新自由主义金融危机日本模式瑞典模式美国模式　出处：《经济学家》2011年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：20世纪80年代,伴随着新自由主义思潮的兴起,发达资本主义国家的不同市场经济模式集体转向了新自由主义市场经济模式。20世纪90年代,美国模式、日本模式和瑞典模式几乎同时爆发了金融危机。美国模式对新自由主义政策进行了短暂调整后,又重蹈覆辙;日本模式则在新自由主义模式与日本模式之间摇摆不定,其结果导致日本经历了"失去的二十年"。瑞典模式则在坚持自身模式合理内核的基础上,弱化了新自由主义政策主张,迅速走出危机,走向持续发展。2007年美国次贷危机标志着新自由主义模式的终结,可以预见,无论是美国模式、日本模式还是瑞典模式,都将在坚持自身模式合理内核的基础上,更加注重向经济绩效和社会绩效均衡发展的方向调整。从本质上看,无论哪种资本主义市场经济模式,都无非是资本主义生产关系的一种调节形式而已,它们都无法从根本上克服资本主义基本矛盾带来的经济周期律。
[Abstract]:In 1980s, with the rise of neoliberal trend of thought, the different market economic models of developed capitalist countries collectively turned to the neoliberal market economy model. 90s, the United States model, The financial crisis broke out in the Japanese model and the Swedish model at the same time. After a brief adjustment of neoliberal policy, the American model made the same mistake again, while the Japanese model wobbled between the neoliberal model and the Japanese model. As a result, Japan experienced a "lost 20 years". The Swedish model, on the basis of sticking to the rational core of its own model, weakened the neoliberal policy proposition and quickly emerged from the crisis. In 2007, the subprime mortgage crisis in the United States marked the end of the neoliberal model. It can be predicted that both the American model, the Japanese model and the Swedish model will adhere to the rational core of their own model. Pay more attention to the direction of balanced development of economic performance and social performance. In essence, whatever capitalist market economy model is nothing more than a form of adjustment of capitalist relations of production, None of them can fundamentally overcome the periodic law of the economy brought about by the fundamental contradictions of capitalism.
【作者单位】：南开大学经济学院经济系;
【基金】：“中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目——重点学科骨干人才资助项目”《马克思主义经济学与当代资本主义多样性研究》成果,项目编号:NKZXA10001
【分类号】：F039;F091.352

【参考文献】