当前位置:主页 > 经济论文 > 经济思想论文 >

关于西方经济学中若干错误模型的论述

发布时间:2018-03-07 00:14

  本文选题:瓦尔拉斯均衡 切入点:不动点 出处:《辽宁师范大学》2010年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】: 近十年来,在国内最具影响和权威性的西方经济学教材(高鸿业主编[1 ],厉以宁主编[ 2],平新乔主编[ 3])中,都给出了自己大量的数学模型,并利用这些数学模型来论述经济学当中的许多问题.然而,这些看上去颇有新意的模型,却不同程度的存在一些问题,也许由于可以想见的原因,这些问题并没有引起充分的讨论. 本文将深入研究[1]和[2]中关于均衡理论和最优理论的数学模型的构建和处理方式,一个是关于交易的一般均衡条件的推导,一个是关于生产和交易的一般均衡条件的模型处理,一个是关于瓦尔拉斯均衡模型的推导,一个是关于经济外部性模型的推导,分析这几个数学模型的问题(甚至是错误)所在,主要探讨的问题有以下几方面: 1、分析模型中涉及到的概念理解和使用问题,尤其以帕累托最优和一般意义最优的含义为主; 2、讨论相关论述中命题条件和结论中的逻辑关系问题.在数学模型中作者混淆充分条件和必要条件,混淆命题和结论,分析作者的错误理解的原因所在,给出正确的理解. 3、讨论相关模型的构建方式和数学推导过程. 4、进一步深化由相关模型引发的数学问题.讨论因此引起的与对应理论相关的结论. 5、修正并评价那些存在问题的数学模型和理论陈述.以上所讨论的问题和论述的对象对促进数学在经济学的应用方面,具有一定的参考意义.对改变某些社会科学研究中的不良学风也有一定的意义. 对在国内最具影响的权威性的经济学文献进行严肃的分析,指陈其中的学术错误,具有较高的学术意义.
[Abstract]:In the past ten years, in the most influential and authoritative textbooks of western economics in China (editor-in-chief Gao Hongye, editor-in-chief Li Yining, and Pingxinjiao), many mathematical models have been given. And use these mathematical models to address many of the problems in economics. However, these models, which seem quite new, have some problems in varying degrees, perhaps for conceivable reasons. These questions have not aroused sufficient discussion. In this paper, we will deeply study the construction and treatment of mathematical models of equilibrium theory and optimal theory in [1] and [2]. One is the derivation of general equilibrium conditions for transactions. One is the model handling of the general equilibrium conditions of production and trade, the other is the derivation of the Valas equilibrium model, the other is the derivation of the economic externality model. To analyze the problems (even errors) of these mathematical models, the main problems discussed are as follows:. 1. Analyzing the conceptual understanding and usage problems involved in the model, especially the meaning of Pareto optimum and general meaning optimization; 2. Discuss the problem of logical relation between propositional condition and conclusion. In mathematical model, author confuses sufficient condition and necessary condition, confuses proposition and conclusion, analyses the reason of author's misunderstandings, and gives out correct understanding. 3. The construction method and mathematical derivation process of related models are discussed. 4. Further deepen the mathematical problems caused by the related models, and discuss the conclusions related to the correspondence theory. (5) to revise and evaluate the mathematical models and theoretical statements of the problems discussed above and the objects discussed above to promote the application of mathematics in economics, It has certain reference meaning, and also has certain significance to change the bad study style in some social science research. It is of great academic significance to make a serious analysis of the most influential and authoritative economic documents in China.
【学位授予单位】:辽宁师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:F224;F0

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前6条

1 谢琳,周晓阳;一个值得商榷的信息价格计算方法[J];辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版);2005年01期

2 谢琳;徐静君;;一个关于经济外部性的错误模型[J];辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版);2006年01期

3 谢琳;张新;;一个令人困惑的瓦尔拉斯均衡模型[J];辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版);2006年02期

4 谢琳;杨强;;一个关于“公地悲剧”的错误推导[J];辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版);2008年01期

5 谢琳;郭志梅;;“科斯定理”并不是一个演绎的结论[J];辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版);2008年03期

6 谢琳;杨少静;;关于“代理人最优行动解”的理解问题[J];辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版);2009年01期



本文编号:1577108

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jjsxs/1577108.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户1a18c***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com