行为理性主体及其决策的理论分析

发布时间：2018-03-07 17:15

本文选题：理性经济人　切入点：理性行为人　出处：《中国工业经济》2013年07期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：经济学家在理性框架内考察决策发生过程所产生的一系列分歧,或许是因为没有从内涵和外延两方面把"行为人"和"经济人"严格区分开来。传统经济学以"经济人"为假设前提,现代经济学实际上是以外延含括了"经济人"的"行为人"概念作为分析假设的。本文注重在说明行为理性属性及其边界的基础上,对经济行为主体作出了符合决策发生过程的界定,并依据决策者现实的决策动机、偏好和效用期望,认为用"理性行为人"来界定经济行为主体,要比"理性经济人"更符合决策发生过程;"理性行为人"强调行为理性决策的发生过程是"先思考后认知再决策",我们用这个新概念可以在一定程度和范围内来解释现代经济学与传统经济学有关行为理性决策相关观点的分歧,可以帮助我们在行为理性理论上获得一些扩大分析视阈的认知。
[Abstract]:Economists examine a series of differences in the process of decision-making within the framework of reason. Perhaps it is because "actor" and "economic man" are not strictly distinguished from each other in terms of connotation and extension. Traditional economics assumes that "economic man" is the premise. In fact, modern economics takes the concept of "actor", which includes "economic man", as the analysis hypothesis. This paper emphasizes on the basis of explaining the rational attribute of behavior and its boundary. According to the decision motive, preference and utility expectation of the decision maker, the author thinks that the economic behavior subject should be defined by "rational actor". "rational economic man" is more in line with the decision-making process than "rational economic man", and "rational actor" emphasizes that the process of rational decision-making is "thinking first, then cognition before making decision". We can use this new concept to a certain extent and within a certain scope. Explaining the differences between modern economics and traditional economics in relation to rational decision-making, It can help us to gain some understanding of expanding the analytical horizon in the theory of behavioral rationality.
【作者单位】：浙江工商大学经济学院;
【基金】：浙江省哲学社会科学重点研究基地(应用经济学)资助项目
【分类号】：C934

【参考文献】