《资本论》第四卷的逻辑:认识发生学

发布时间：2018-04-18 15:26

本文选题：《资本论》 + 历史部分　；参考：《当代经济研究》2012年10期

【摘要】：《资本论》第四卷实践的逻辑是:范畴发生的认识机理。在这种意义上,它使范畴的"生产"实践化,首要性地贯彻了"认识"由"历史"生产的原则。历史部分和理论部分的相互构成形成总的写作逻辑,历史部分确立了后续研究的理论指针。方法论意蕴是:(1)根据历史生产方式的"自然生长",显露范畴的内核的生理结构——(剩余)价值;(2)由范畴生产上的层级运动,揭示"结构生长"的历史性;(3)通过"理论"的总体生产,最大程度地彰显方法论批判和认识论批判的内在结合性,具象出政治经济学批判的实践工作路线。因此,它否决了考茨基非法编纂《剩余价值学说史》的错误要求。《资本论》整体上也就统一了"两种认识发生学",即历史(发展)的逻辑和认识(发展)的逻辑,统一了历史的方法与范畴的方法。这种整体性研究树立了政治经济学方法论的构造典范。
[Abstract]:The logic of practice in the fourth volume of Capital is the cognitive mechanism of the occurrence of category.In this sense, it makes the category of "production" into practice and, first of all, implements the principle of "cognition" produced by "history".The mutual formation of the historical part and the theoretical part forms the total writing logic, and the historical part establishes the theoretical guideline for the follow-up study.The implication of methodology is that according to the "natural growth" of the historical production mode, the physiological structure of the core of the category ((residual) value / value) is revealed by the hierarchical movement of the category production.Through the overall production of "theory", the inner combination of methodology criticism and epistemological criticism is demonstrated to the greatest extent, and the practical work route of political economic criticism is embodied.Therefore, it rejected the erroneous request of Kautsky's illegal compilation of the History of the Theory of surplus value. "Capital" as a whole unified the logic of "two cognitive genomics", namely, the logic of history (development) and the logic of cognition (development).Unifies the historical method and the category method.This holistic study sets a model for the methodology of political economy.
【作者单位】：江西财经大学经济学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目(11BJL009)
【分类号】：F091.91

【参考文献】