新自由主义与国家空间:反思与启示

发布时间：2018-05-12 16:45

本文选题：新自由主义 + 国家空间　；参考：《经济地理》2012年10期

【摘要】：2008年以来的全球金融危机将世界政治经济环境推向所谓的后新自由主义时代。文章首先回顾新自由主义的起源,以及不同政治地理背景下的新自由主义在发展与演变过程中的异同。其后,文章介绍学术界对新自由主义思潮获致的三点共识:其一,民族国家的意义并没有因为新自由主义而消亡;其二,理解政府在经济发展中的角色对于理解新自由主义至关重要;其三,新自由主义的发展因地而异。新自由主义思潮在全球扩散的同时塑造新的国家空间。新国家空间有三个特点:尺度重组、柔性边界与扁平化。研究指出,不论新自由主义是否终结,其局限性已经凸显,因此有必要跳出新自由主义的思维模式,思考如何在新自由主义创造的所谓新国家空间中,重塑政府监管,思考各国发展经济的全球责任,并思考创造社会空间再分配模式的可持续性等问题。
[Abstract]:The global financial crisis since 2008 pushed the world's political and economic environment to the so-called post-neoliberal era. The article first reviews the origin of neoliberalism and the similarities and differences in the development and evolution of neoliberalism under different political geography background. Then, the article introduces the academic consensus on neoliberalism: first, the significance of nation-state has not died because of neoliberalism; second, Understanding the role of government in economic development is crucial to understanding neoliberalism; third, the development of neoliberalism varies from place to place. The neoliberal trend of thought diffuses in the world at the same time molds the new national space. The new national space has three characteristics: scale reorganization, flexible boundary and flattening. The study points out that no matter whether neoliberalism is over or not, its limitations have been highlighted, so it is necessary to jump out of the neoliberal mode of thinking and think about how to reshape government regulation in the so-called new national space created by neoliberalism. To think about the global responsibility of each country to develop economy, and to think about the sustainability of social space redistribution model.
【作者单位】：中山大学地理科学与规划学院;广东省城市化与地理环境空间模拟重点实验室;香港大学城市规划及设计系;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金项目(40401017)
【分类号】：F091.352

【参考文献】