制度分析的方法论比较及其实践效应

发布时间：2018-05-13 13:55

本文选题：制度分析 + 引导假定　；参考：《经济社会体制比较》2011年02期

【摘要】：制度分析需要探究制度的产生原因、发展轨迹、内在缺陷以及完善路向,它注重的是问题的发现和改进的措施,而不仅仅是对实在制度的某种解释。基于这一思路,制度分析的方法论可以从这样几个方面进行审视:在初始的假设设定上,看它是一种作为纯粹解释的先验抽象还是改革方向的理想状态;在分析的推理逻辑上,看它是一种注重形式的数理逻辑还是实质的行为逻辑;在结论的评价标准上,看它是一种基于特定目的的效率原则还是应得权利的正义原则;在潜含的利益导向上,看它是体现崇尚优胜劣汰的强者意志还是人本关怀的弱者诉求;在推出的政策特性上,看它是展示了一种维护现状的消极保守取向还是改革现状的积极进取取向。在很大程度上,现代主流经济学体现了前一种研究取向,这导致制度分析路线迄今一直很不成熟。
[Abstract]:Institutional analysis needs to explore the cause, development track, internal defects and the direction of perfection of the system. It focuses on the discovery of problems and improvement measures, not only on some interpretation of the real system. Based on this idea, the methodology of system analysis can be examined from several aspects: in the initial hypothesis setting, it is an ideal state as a priori abstract of pure interpretation or as a direction of reform; in the logic of analysis, To see whether it is a formal mathematical logic or a substantive behavioral logic; to see whether it is an efficiency principle based on a specific purpose or a just principle of due rights in the evaluation criteria of a conclusion; and to be guided by the underlying interests. To see whether it is the will of the strong who advocates the survival of the fittest or the demand of the weak who care for the people first, and whether it shows a negative conservative orientation of maintaining the status quo or a positive and enterprising orientation of the reform status quo in terms of the policy characteristics introduced. To a large extent, modern mainstream economics embodies the former research orientation, which leads to the institutional analysis line has been very immature up to now.
【作者单位】：中山大学岭南学院经济研究所;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金项目(项目编号:70971143)的支持
【分类号】：F091.3

【参考文献】