论一定长度的工作日表现为相同的价值产品——回应“成正比”争议的第1个命题

发布时间：2018-05-25 19:21

本文选题：成正比 + 同一劳动　；参考：《教学与研究》2011年11期

【摘要】：成正比的争议涉及两个命题:一是,一定长度的工作日总是表现为相同的价值产品;二是,劳动生产率提高,单位商品价值量下降。本文回应的是关于第一个命题的争议。在这个问题的争议中,我们看到了"有效劳动系数"、"实际售卖价值"、"期差性"、"价值转换系数"等种种"用语"。这些用语没有用来解决实际矛盾即用来说明在资本主义生产方式下,"规则只能作为没有规则性的盲目起作用的平均数规律来为自己开辟道路",反而被用来企图以个别企业的偶然性偏离来否定必然性的一般规律即"不管生产力发生了什么变化,同一劳动在同样的时间内提供的价值量总是相同的。"很显然,这种否定是徒劳的。
[Abstract]:Proportional disputes involve two propositions: one is that a certain length of working day is always the same value product, the other is that the labor productivity increases and the unit commodity value decreases. This paper responds to the controversy over the first proposition. In this dispute, we see "effective labor coefficient", "actual sale value", "period difference", "value conversion coefficient" and so on. These terms are not used to solve practical contradictions, that is to say, in the capitalist mode of production, "rules can only open the way for themselves as an unruly, blindly functioning average law", and instead are used to attempt to create a path for themselves. The accidental deviation of individual enterprises negates the general law of inevitability, that is, "whatever changes have taken place in productive forces," The same labor always provides the same amount of value at the same time. " Obviously, this negation is futile.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学马克思主义学院;中国社会科学院马克思主义研究院;
【分类号】：F014.2

【相似文献】