制度变迁进程与区域经济差距变动研究

发布时间：2018-06-22 03:29

本文选题：制度变迁 + 制度变迁进程　；参考：《浙江工商大学》2007年硕士论文

【摘要】： 区域经济差距作为经济增长的“副产品”，曾经或正在困扰着大多数国家或地区的经济发展。我国也存在严重的区域经济差距问题，主要体现在东西部、省际、省内以及城乡差距等方面。该问题引起了政界和学术界的广泛关注。本文结合制度经济学、新古典经济学以及区域经济学的有关理论范畴，对制度变迁进程与区域经济差距变动趋势的内在联系做了尝试性分析。文章首先对区域经济差距研究文献与制度变迁的一般理论进行评述。针对理论界关于此选题的研究角度各异的事实，我们从生产要素、经济发展战略、国际贸易、地方政府等视角对相关文献进行了介绍与评论；而制度变迁作为制度经济学的一个基本范畴，也是一个存在很多争议的概念，不同学者对其形式与动力的理解还存在一些差异，因此，我们力图通过辨析这些差异为后续研究做一些理论准备。其次，基于区域制度环境的复杂性与制度变迁之新古典传统与演化传统在方法论倾向与研究对象上的互补性，，对融合两种传统来分析区域制度变迁的可能性与必要性进行了探讨，在此基础上，模型分析了制度变迁进程的不平衡现象，发现生产要素在区域之间的不平衡流动有可能会引致主体(政府、厂商和个人)和社会经济系统的适应性调整，从而导致制度变迁不平衡推进出现放大效应。再次，在规模报酬不变与生产函数同质假设的基础上，给出了制度变迁进程演绎区域经济差距变动的一般模型，并分别从规模报酬可变、生产函数异质以及规模报酬可变与生产函数异质三个角度对一般模型进行了扩展；分析结论显示制度变迁不平衡推进的放大效应在某种程度上是区域经济差距马太效应的制度根源，而且规模报酬递增或生产函数异质(e＞1)倾向于增强制度变迁进程影响区域经济差距变动的效应。最后，作为本文观点之联系实际的论证，文章从体制转轨进程与东中西部经济差距以及产业组织演进与东部经济的快速发展两个方面进行了简要的实证分析。与其他区域经济差距研究有所不同，本文利用制度变迁进程变量演绎了区域经济差距变动问题。该理论进路尽管与区域经济学的主流分析范式存在一定的差异，但却也得出了一些比较有益的结论，对于拓宽理解区域经济差距问题具有一定的意义。
[Abstract]:As a by-product of economic growth, regional economic disparity has been or is puzzling the economic development of most countries or regions. There are also serious regional economic gaps in China, mainly reflected in the eastern and western, provincial, provincial and urban and rural areas. This problem has aroused the widespread concern of the political and academic circles. Combined with the relevant theoretical categories of institutional economics, neoclassical economics and regional economics, this paper makes a tentative analysis of the internal relationship between the process of institutional change and the changing trend of regional economic disparity. This paper first reviews the literature on regional economic disparity and the general theory of institutional change. In view of the fact that the theoretical circle studies this topic from different angles, we introduce and comment on the relevant literature from the perspectives of factors of production, economic development strategy, international trade, local government and so on; As a basic category of institutional economics, institutional change is also a controversial concept. Different scholars still have some differences in their understanding of its form and motivation. We try to make some theoretical preparations for the further study by discriminating these differences. Secondly, based on the complexity of regional institutional environment and institutional changes, the neo-classical tradition and evolutionary tradition are complementary in methodology tendency and research object. On the basis of analyzing the possibility and necessity of regional institutional change by combining the two traditions, the model analyzes the unbalanced phenomenon of the process of institutional change. It is found that the unbalanced flow of factors of production in different regions may lead to adaptive adjustment of the main body (government, firm and individual) and social economic system, thus leading to the amplification effect of the unbalanced advancement of institutional change. Thirdly, on the basis of the assumption that the scale return is invariant and the production function is homogeneous, this paper gives a general model to deduce the regional economic disparity change in the process of institutional change, and respectively variable from the scale reward. The general model is extended from three angles: the heterogeneity of production function, the variable return of scale and the heterogeneity of production function. The conclusion shows that the magnification effect of the unbalanced advancement of institutional change is the institutional root of the Matthew effect of regional economic disparity to some extent. Moreover, the increasing returns of scale or the heterogeneity of production function (e > 1) tend to enhance the effect of the process of institutional change on the regional economic gap. Finally, as the argument of this paper, the paper makes a brief empirical analysis from two aspects: the process of system transition and the economic gap between east, west and west as well as the evolution of industrial organization and the rapid development of eastern economy. Different from other regional economic gap studies, this paper deduces the regional economic disparity by using institutional change process variables. Although there are some differences between the theoretical approach and the mainstream analytical paradigm of regional economics, some useful conclusions are drawn, which are of certain significance to broaden the understanding of regional economic disparity.
【学位授予单位】：浙江工商大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：F061.5

【相似文献】