市场结构、制度引进与制度生根

发布时间：2018-07-02 23:59

本文选题：市场结构 + 制度引进　；参考：《学术月刊》2013年06期

【摘要】：作为制度引进之国或地区提升自身制度的一种手段,制度引进的最终目的在于通过对所引进制度进行适应性制度嫁接而厚植制度引进之国或地区本身制度创新的潜能,以实现制度生根。不同性质的市场结构对制度引进厂商及产业的适应性制度嫁接成本、参与制度引进竞赛的厂商数量以及制度生根本身各自具有不同的影响效应。与制度引进相关的制度创新存在溢出效应,且溢出效应对产业的制度学习具有乘数效应,并可藉此加速在产业层面形成相关制度基础及产业共有制度能力。溢出效应对制度生根具有正向影响效应,且溢出效应更强与竞争强度更高的市场结构更利于实现并加速制度生根。在一般常见的市场竞争结构中,如若边缘厂商的制度效率并不高于主导厂商,且边缘厂商的初始制度引进成本与其适应性制度嫁接成本为替代关系,则边缘厂商与主导厂商之间的制度引进竞争加剧不但无法加速制度生根,反倒会造成边缘厂商初始制度引进成本投入的大量重复浪费,进而难以促进社会福利极大化目标的实现。
[Abstract]:As a means for the country or region of institutional introduction to upgrade its own system, the ultimate purpose of institutional introduction is to enrich the potential of institutional innovation of the country or region that introduced the system through adaptive institutional grafting. In order to achieve the root of the system. Different characteristics of market structure have different effects on the adaptive institutional grafting cost of institutional importing firms and industries, the number of firms participating in the competition of institutional introduction and the rooting of institutions. Institutional innovation related to institutional introduction has spillover effects, and spillover effects have multiplier effect on institutional learning of industry, and thus accelerate the formation of relevant institutional basis and industrial common institutional capacity at the industrial level. The spillover effect has a positive effect on institutional rooting, and the market structure with stronger spillover effect and higher competition intensity is more conducive to the realization and acceleration of institutional rooting. In the common market competition structure, if the institutional efficiency of the marginal firm is not higher than that of the leading firm, and the initial institutional introduction cost and the adaptive institutional grafting cost of the marginal firm are the substitution relations, If the institutional introduction competition between the marginal firm and the leading firm is intensified, it will not only fail to accelerate the institutional rooting, but will result in a large amount of repeated waste of the initial institutional introduction cost input of the marginal firm. Thus, it is difficult to promote the realization of the goal of maximization of social welfare.
【作者单位】：武汉大学经济与管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“中国国有企业治理重构及其演化路径研究”(08CJY032) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目“治理人假设与和谐公司治理”(NCET-11-0412)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：F062.9

【参考文献】