斯蒂德曼讨论联合生产条件下价值决定问题的主要错误与纠正

发布时间：2018-07-05 00:38

本文选题：斯蒂德曼 + 联合生产　；参考：《经济纵横》2013年04期

【摘要】：斯蒂德曼曾经列举一个所谓联合生产条件下的数值例子,得出负的商品价值,以此否定马克思的劳动价值理论,而支持斯拉法的价格理论。斯蒂德曼的研究受到国内外不少学者的反驳,但是这些反驳尚有不足,未能抓住斯蒂德曼研究的几处根本错误。本文详细解剖斯蒂德曼和其他学者的数值分析观点,指出斯蒂德曼研究中的几个根本错误:一是斯蒂德曼的两个生产程式的确存在不同的生产效率,所以不能直接用他的联立方程来求解价值量,同时也不适合用他所使用的投入产出法来求解单一产品的价值量。二是既然这两个生产程式具有不同的生产效率,那么它们在价格体系中就不存在利润的平均化问题。三是斯蒂德曼公式一方面表明利润是商品自身创造的,另一方面又表明商品自身不创造剩余价值,存在自相矛盾问题。针对斯蒂德曼所举数值例子,相对于其他学者,本文给出了更符合马克思原意的纠正性解答。
[Abstract]:Studeman once cited a numerical example under the so-called joint production condition to obtain negative commodity value which negates Marx's labor value theory and supports Slavat's price theory. The research of Studeman has been refuted by many scholars at home and abroad, but these refutations are still insufficient and fail to grasp several fundamental mistakes of Studeman research. This paper dissects the numerical analysis views of Studeman and other scholars in detail, and points out several fundamental errors in the study of Studeman. One is that the two production programs of Studeman do have different production efficiency. Therefore, it is not possible to directly use his simultaneous equation to solve the value of a single product, nor is it suitable to use the input-output method used by him to solve the value of a single product. Second, since the two production programs have different production efficiency, they do not have the problem of average profit in the price system. The third is that the Studeman formula shows that the profit is created by the commodity itself, on the other hand, it shows that the commodity itself does not create the surplus value, which is contradictory. For the numerical example given by Studeman, this paper gives a more correct solution than other scholars.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院马克思主义研究院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金规划课题“国外劳动价值论‘新解释’最新发展研究”(12BJL002)的成果
【分类号】：F014.3

【参考文献】