专业化分工与广义价值论——基于消费—生产者两阶段决策方法的新框架

发布时间：2018-12-16 11:56

【摘要】：本文运用修正后的消费—生产者的一般均衡分析框架,试图为广义价值理论建立一个严谨坚实的微观基础。首先,本文在构建理论模型时,采用了"消费—生产者两阶段决策"方法,即消费—生产者首先选择最大化总产值的生产决策,继而选择最大化效用的消费决策,藉以修正新兴古典原有框架下分工模式与结构外生于消费—生产者选择行为的缺点。也就是说,在本文修正后的新兴古典框架中,分工的模式与结构是消费—生产者两阶段决策的内生结果。其次,本文不仅考虑到了市场出清条件,并且加入了部门间劳动力受产能限制下的配置条件即比较利益率相等原则,赋予了一般均衡系统更加具体且实际的经济涵义。最后,本文由生产函数的规模报酬特征和内生或外生的比较优势来定义不同的分工体系,从而使广义价值论涵盖了所有的分工体系,进而论证了无论是在可变分工、不变分工抑或是混合分工体系下,劳动价值论都只是广义价值论的一个特例。
[Abstract]:This paper attempts to establish a rigorous and solid micro basis for the generalized value theory by using the revised general equilibrium analysis framework of consumption-producer. First of all, this paper adopts the "consumer-producer two-stage decision" method when constructing the theoretical model, that is, the consumption-producer first chooses the production decision to maximize the total output value, and then chooses the consumption decision to maximize the utility. In order to correct the new classical framework of division of labor model and structure born out of consumption-producer choice behavior shortcomings. That is to say, in the revised neoclassical framework, the pattern and structure of division of labor is the endogenous result of the two stages of consumer-producer decision. Secondly, this paper not only considers the condition of market clearing, but also adds the principle of equal ratio of comparative benefits to the allocation condition of interdepartmental labor force under the limitation of productivity, which endows the general equilibrium system with more concrete and practical economic meaning. Finally, this paper defines different division systems according to the characteristics of scale reward and endogenous or exogenous comparative advantages of the production function, so that the generalized theory of value covers all the division systems, and then proves that the division of labor is variable. Under the system of invariant division or mixed division of labor, the theory of labor value is only a special case of generalized theory of value.
【作者单位】：清华大学政治经济学研究中心;厦门大学经济学院;
【分类号】：F224;F014

【参考文献】