西方马克思主义研究者对所有制与所有权的辨析

发布时间：2019-01-11 14:54

【摘要】：法国结构主义的马克思主义学派的代表人物巴里巴尔和英国分析马克思主义学派的代表人物科恩,都对马克思主义理论中的所有制和所有权概念进行了辨析。巴里巴尔认为,资本主义条件下所有制与所有权具有直接同一性,本质上所有权的产生和变化是由所有制决定的,但同时所有权具有相对独立性,它在作用对象、变化方式以及所反映的关系等方面与所有制存在差别。科恩用分析哲学的研究方法辨析了所有制和所有权,并提出"合法性问题"和"解释方向问题"。他认为,尽管马克思使用所有权这样的法律术语来描述经济关系,但赋予所有权以经济含义。经济意义上的所有权是一种权力,它与法律意义上的所有权相对应,但又有明显差别,前者属于经济基础,后者属于上层建筑,后者是由前者来解释和说明的。巴里巴尔的研究是以资本主义所有制为主要对象,目的在于理清社会的内部结构;科恩的研究则更为抽象和一般,其目的在于澄清概念间的逻辑关系。二人的研究都有一定的片面性。
[Abstract]:Barry Barr, the representative of the French structuralist Marxist school, and Cohen, the representative of the British Analytical Marxism School, both discriminate and analyze the concepts of ownership and ownership in Marxist theory. Barry Barr believes that ownership and ownership are directly identical under capitalist conditions. Essentially, ownership is determined by ownership, but at the same time ownership is relatively independent. There are differences between the mode of change and the relationship between ownership and ownership. Cohen used analytical philosophy to analyze ownership and ownership, and put forward "legitimacy problem" and "interpretation direction problem". He argued that although Marx used legal terms such as ownership to describe economic relations, ownership was given economic meaning. The ownership in the economic sense is a kind of power, which corresponds to the ownership in the legal sense, but has obvious difference. The former belongs to the economic foundation, the latter belongs to the superstructure, and the latter is explained and explained by the former. The main object of the study is capitalist ownership, which aims at clarifying the internal structure of society, while Cohen's study is more abstract and general, and its purpose is to clarify the logical relationship between concepts. Both of them have a certain one-sidedness in their research.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院马克思主义研究院;
【分类号】：F014.1

【共引文献】