我国海运服务贸易支配权影响因素分析与评价研究
发布时间:2018-05-05 20:55
本文选题:海运服务贸易 + 支配权 ; 参考:《大连海事大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:我国加入WTO以来,随着参与经济全球化进程的加深,我国外贸进出口总额呈现迅猛发展的态势。在我国货物贸易快速发展的同时,服务贸易也得到较快发展。作为传统优势产业的海运服务贸易也得到了快速的发展,目前我国已成为世界海运大国。但是在海运服务贸易发展的过程中,我国仍面临着诸多的问题,尤其与国际海运强国相比,我国海运服务贸易和海运业仍处于相对弱势地位。并且随着入世承诺的履行,我国的海运服务业的开放程度已经处于世界前沿,甚至超过部分欧美发达国家,因此,我国海运服务贸易将面临着竞争更加激烈的市场环境。综上可见,我国海运服务贸易可能面临着海运服务贸易资源不能有效配置,支配权水平偏低,发展受到严重挑战的局面。本文则是从支配权的角度来考察我国海运服务贸易的现状与存在的问题。为进一步研究海运服务贸易相关问题提供借鉴与参考。 本文首先对海运服务贸易支配权相关概念进行了界定。根据了海运服务贸易相关概念,结合民法中支配权概念的使用,提出了海运服务贸易支配权概念,并根据支配权表现形式上的分类,将海运服务贸易支配权分为资源实力要素、国际环境要素及技术实力要素三个方面,并分别进行阐述。一个国家的支配权水平高低,不仅取决于可支配资源的多少,也决定于能否正确配置资源,行使支配权力。本文的第三章,对我国海运服务贸易支配权现状进行分析,并揭示出我国海运服务贸易支配权所存在的问题。 本文主要运用了层次分析法及证据推理法两种方法对海运服务贸易支配权构成因素进行定量分析。使用层次分析法结合专家打分,对海运服务贸易支配权构成因素进行赋值权重。另外,运用证据推理法,根据定量和定性数据,对我国及另外11个海运大国的海运服务贸易支配权进行评分。并进行比较分析,解释我国海运服务贸易支配权存在的问题。
[Abstract]:Since China's entry into WTO, with the deepening of economic globalization, the total import and export of China's foreign trade has been developing rapidly. With the rapid development of China's trade in goods, trade in services has also developed rapidly. Seaborne service trade, as a traditional advantage industry, has also been developed rapidly. At present, China has become a big shipping country in the world. However, in the process of the development of marine service trade, China is still facing many problems, especially compared with the international shipping power, China's maritime services trade and shipping industry are still in a relatively weak position. With the implementation of WTO commitments, the opening degree of China's maritime services has been in the forefront of the world, even more than some developed countries in Europe and the United States. Therefore, China's seaborne service trade will face a more competitive market environment. It can be seen that China's marine service trade may be faced with the situation that the resources of seaborne service trade can not be effectively allocated, the level of control power is on the low side, and the development of seaborne service trade is seriously challenged. This paper examines the status quo and existing problems of China's maritime trade in services from the perspective of dominance. It provides reference and reference for further research on issues related to maritime trade in services. At first, this paper defines the concept of the right to control maritime trade in services. According to the concept of maritime trade in services, combined with the use of the concept of dominance in the civil law, this paper puts forward the concept of dominance of maritime trade in services, and according to the classification of the form of the power of control, it divides the dominating power of maritime trade in services into the elements of resource strength. International environmental factor and technical strength factor three aspects, and separately carries on elaboration. The level of dominating power in a country depends not only on the number of disposable resources, but also on whether or not to allocate resources correctly and exercise the dominating power. In the third chapter, the author analyzes the current situation of China's maritime services trade control, and reveals the existing problems of China's maritime services trade dominance. In this paper, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and evidential reasoning method are used to quantitatively analyze the factors that constitute the dominating power of maritime service trade. This paper uses AHP and experts to assign weight to the components of maritime service trade. In addition, according to the quantitative and qualitative data, the control power of maritime trade in China and the other 11 major maritime countries is evaluated by using the evidence reasoning method. And carries on the comparative analysis, explains our country maritime transport service trade control right existence question.
【学位授予单位】:大连海事大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:F752.68;F552
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 于立新;开放中国航运服务贸易市场的思考[J];财贸经济;1999年10期
2 任强;;当前我国海运业的发展状况与对策[J];大陆桥视野;2010年08期
3 邬关荣;析海运费上涨对我国出口贸易的影响及对策[J];对外经贸实务;1999年09期
4 张明伟;;由一则案例浅析FOB价格术语下出口企业海运费用风险[J];对外经贸实务;2008年09期
5 张金v,
本文编号:1849267
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jtysjj/1849267.html