宁波—舟山港和上海港港口物流竞争力评价研究
本文选题:港口物流 + 港口物流竞争力评价 ; 参考:《浙江理工大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:港口是海陆运输的节点,服务于资源流通,在社会经济中具有重要的地位。随着我国经济快速发展,沿海、沿江港口的数量和规模都有了较快的增长,港口对经济的推动不仅促进了港口的建设开发,也带来了港口之间的竞争。从同属于长江三角洲经济圈的宁波—舟山港和上海港来看:宁波港在国际上的地位不及上海港,但拥有的水深条件是其核心竞争优势,2006年,宁波港与舟山港完成一体化,2011年,舟山群岛新区的批复建设,都有利于宁波—舟山港整合优势资源,向世界级大港迈进;上海港历来是中国乃至国际上的重要口岸,具有区位、资源等优势,但水深条件一直是上海港发展的软肋,,上海港通过在舟山建立大小洋山深水港来缓解困境。港口恶性竞争会导致重复建设和资源浪费,不利于可持续发展。本文希望在港口物流竞争力分析的基础上探讨两港的合作发展模式,对于两港的未来发展和国家的战略投资、决策支持都有重要的现实意义 本文针对宁波—舟山港和上海港的港口物流竞争力水平展开研究,首先构建港口物流竞争力评价模型,确定指标体系和评价方法,然后运用统计学的因子分析方法,对两港港口物流竞争力进行实证分析,为探讨两港的合作模式提供了量化的实际参考指标。最后,根据评价结果,分析两港之间的竞争优势劣势,以及竞争关系的产生,并提出以战略联盟为核心的合作模式。 本文的结论包括三个方面。第一,确立了包括港口物流营运规模、基础设施、管理状况、腹地经济水平及发展潜力等五个方面20项评价指标的港口物流竞争力评价指标体系。第二,基于因子分析法的港口物流竞争力评价模型的构建与实证分析,上海港在营运规模、基础设施、管理状况、腹地经济水平的得分都高于宁波—舟山港,而宁波—舟山港在发展潜力及部分细分指标上的得分高于上海港。第三,提出以战略联盟为核心的合作模式,包括合作规则、战略联盟制度以及风险控制三方面。本文的创新点主要体现在港口物流竞争力评价体系的设计、以战略联盟为核心的合作模式两方面。
[Abstract]:As the node of land and sea transportation, port serves the circulation of resources and plays an important role in social economy. With the rapid development of our country's economy, the quantity and scale of the ports along the Yangtze River have increased rapidly. The promotion of the port to the economy has not only promoted the construction and development of the port, but also brought about the competition between the ports. From the point of view of Ningbo Zhoushan Port and Shanghai Port, which belong to the same economic circle of the Yangtze River Delta, Ningbo Port is not as important as Shanghai Port in the world, but its core competitive advantage is the water depth condition. In 2006, Ningbo Port and Zhoushan Port were integrated into one another. In 2011, The approval and construction of the new Zhoushan Archipelago area will be conducive to the integration of Ningbo and Zhoushan Port into a world-class port. The Shanghai Port has always been an important port in China and even internationally, with advantages in location, resources, and so on. But the condition of water depth has always been the weakness of the development of Shanghai Port, which can alleviate the difficulties by setting up the large and small Yangshan Deep Water Port in Zhoushan. Port vicious competition will lead to repeated construction and waste of resources, which is not conducive to sustainable development. Based on the analysis of port logistics competitiveness, this paper hopes to discuss the development mode of cooperation between the two ports, which has important practical significance for the future development of the two ports and the strategic investment of the country. In this paper, the level of port logistics competitiveness of Ningbo Zhoushan Port and Shanghai Port is studied. Firstly, the evaluation model of port logistics competitiveness is constructed, the index system and evaluation method are determined, and then the statistical factor analysis method is used. The empirical analysis of the logistics competitiveness of the two ports provides a quantitative reference index for the discussion of the cooperation mode between the two ports. Finally, according to the evaluation results, this paper analyzes the competitive advantages and disadvantages between the two ports, as well as the emergence of the competitive relationship, and puts forward a cooperation model with strategic alliance as the core. The conclusion of this paper includes three aspects. Firstly, 20 evaluation indexes including port logistics operation scale, infrastructure, management status, hinterland economic level and development potential are established, and the evaluation index system of port logistics competitiveness is established. Second, the construction and empirical analysis of the evaluation model of port logistics competitiveness based on factor analysis show that the scores of Shanghai Port in the scale of operation, infrastructure, management status, economic level in hinterland are higher than those in Ningbo-Zhoushan Port. Ningbo-Zhoushan Port has higher development potential and subdivision index than Shanghai Port. Thirdly, it puts forward the cooperation mode with strategic alliance as the core, including three aspects: cooperation rules, strategic alliance system and risk control. The innovation of this paper is mainly reflected in the design of the evaluation system of port logistics competitiveness and the cooperation mode with strategic alliance as the core.
【学位授予单位】:浙江理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:F552.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李玲;;浅析区域港口竞合模式与机制[J];中国储运;2011年04期
2 朱道立;吉阿兵;;港口价格竞争策略研究[J];复旦学报(自然科学版);2006年05期
3 罗旋;;基于第四代港口概念的港口竞合发展[J];港口经济;2010年02期
4 赵相英;;传统港口物流向现代港口物流发展的特征[J];中国港口;2008年04期
5 俞海宏;王晓萍;;基于竞合博弈的长三角港口关系探讨[J];中国港口;2010年09期
6 李超 ,张罕育;竞争合作:港口发展新趋势[J];中国经贸;2004年07期
7 王晓萍;应奇君;;合作竞争,实现双赢——宁波—舟山港与上海港集装箱运输的竞合[J];经营与管理;2009年09期
8 真虹;中国集装箱港口竞争现状与趋势[J];集装箱化;2004年04期
9 姚列钟;;宁波——舟山港与上海港的竞争态势及宁波——舟山港的应对策略[J];集装箱化;2011年02期
10 李纬韬;港口企业经营竞争力评价指标体系[J];交通科技与经济;2004年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 孙正;基于竞合战略的青岛港物流整合研究[D];中国海洋大学;2010年
2 肖海辉;珠三角与长三角港口物流竞争力比较研究[D];广东商学院;2011年
3 聂琦;论港口在现代物流中的地位和作用[D];上海海运学院;2000年
4 陆成云;港口竞争力评价模型的构建及应用[D];上海海事大学;2003年
5 徐风光;港口竞争力评价研究[D];大连海事大学;2005年
6 何鑫;我国主要港口物流竞争分析与评价[D];武汉理工大学;2006年
7 曹海龙;港口物流系统构建及评价研究[D];大连海事大学;2007年
8 余科辉;沪甬两港合作竞争战略探究[D];上海海事大学;2007年
9 陈淼;港口群内港口竞争与合作研究[D];上海海事大学;2007年
10 阚春燕;南通港口竞争力评价及提升策略研究[D];南京理工大学;2009年
本文编号:1903864
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jtysjj/1903864.html