分享经济时代政府监管方式的创新路径——以网约车新政为例

发布时间：2018-05-30 06:04

  本文选题：网约车 + 分享经济　； 参考：《内蒙古社会科学(汉文版)》2017年05期

【摘要】：政府拥有公共道路资源经营和监管"合二为一"的特权,强化了出租车监管预期租金收益和在准租金分配中的剩余控制权,而政府与平台公司之间的信息不对称,造成政府难以达到合意的监管效果;网约车监管新政仍然沿袭了传统巡游车过度依赖行政许可的"公序"监管方式,致使监管新政成为传统出租车的政策庇护,难以摆脱诺斯悖论和管制俘获。针对平台公司搭建的双边市场特性,政府需要适度弱化"公序"监管的刚性,以包容的态度充分发挥"私序"监管的辅助作用,最终实现"公序"与"私序"监管的兼容。为了更好地发展分享经济,就监管方式创新提出五点政策建议:一是坚持对分享经济身份认同、包容发展的态度;二是探索智能化监管;三是探索专业化监管;四是坚持监管的公益性;五是加强网络化治理。
[Abstract]:The government has the privilege of "merging" the public road resource management and supervision, which strengthens the expected rental income and the residual control right in the quasi-rent distribution, and the information asymmetry between the government and the platform company. As a result, it is difficult for the government to achieve the desired regulatory effect; the New deal for the Regulation of car rides still follows the traditional "public order" mode of overreliance on administrative licenses for cruise vehicles, which has led to the new policy of regulating new regulations to become a policy shelter for traditional taxis. It is difficult to get rid of the North paradox and control capture. In view of the bilateral market characteristics of platform companies, the government needs to weaken the rigidity of "public order" supervision, give full play to the auxiliary role of "private order" supervision, and finally realize the compatibility between "public order" and "private order" supervision. In order to develop the sharing economy better, the paper puts forward five policy suggestions on the innovation of supervision mode: one is to insist on the attitude of identity of sharing economy, the other is to explore intelligent supervision, and the third is to explore specialized supervision. Fourth, adhere to the public welfare of supervision; fifth, strengthen network governance.
【作者单位】： 常州轻工职业技术学院经贸管理系;南京邮电大学人文与社会科学学院;南京邮电大学期刊社;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“区域经济差异视角下我国碳排放的政府环境责任与公众参与机制研究”(编号:16BJL074)
【分类号】：D922.296;F572;F724.6
，

本文编号：1954203