中国民航服务业放松管制绩效的实证研究

发布时间：2018-10-09 20:10

【摘要】：2002年的《民航体制改革方案》和2005年的《国内投资民用航空业规定》是中国民航业发展过程中极为重要的两份文件。前者引导了民航业的重组改革,标志着中国民航业政企分离的开始；后者对于中国民航业的市场开放有着深远影响。对改革前后民航业市场的绩效研究不仅是对于民航业放松管制政策的客观评价也为进一步改革发展提供了理论和实证依据。本文以产业组织理论为基础,采用DEA估计民航服务业的产业绩效,并在此基础上采用2001-2011年中国及东南亚地区的民航服务业相关数据为样本,使用双重差分等方法,对放松管制与产业绩效之间的关系进行了实证研究。本文通过实证研究分析可以得到结论:(1)产业重组的改变在短期内对产业绩效的影响并不显著,但长期内资产重组对产业绩效呈负向影响,表明2002年以来由政府直接主导的企业重组对产业绩效的提升作用效果非常有限。(2)市场开放对于产业绩效的影响不管是在短期还是长期都表现出显著的积极性的影响。(3)民航企业之间的竞争更多地体现在市场范围的扩张,即增量竞争代替存量竞争。拥有更多的生产能力和更多的线路经营权成为占领这个市场的主要因素,规模竞争代替了价格竞争成为民航市场竞争的主要工具。实证结果体现了以规模扩张和市场范围扩张为主导的我国民航业阶段性发展特征,也体现了民航业在放松管制和市场化的路径中的渐进性改革的一般逻辑和模式；认为进一步放松价格、线路经营等方面的管制,开放燃油市场和低空域市场,强化机场监管,重建航空业管制体制和空域资源管制体制将是未来航空业的深化改革趋势。
[Abstract]:The Civil Aviation system Reform Program in 2002 and the domestic Investment in Civil Aviation regulations in 2005 are two important documents in the development of China's civil aviation industry. The former leads to the reorganization and reform of the civil aviation industry and marks the beginning of the separation of government and enterprises in China's civil aviation industry, while the latter has a profound impact on the opening up of the market of China's civil aviation industry. The research on the performance of the civil aviation market before and after the reform is not only an objective evaluation of the deregulation policy of the civil aviation industry, but also provides a theoretical and empirical basis for the further reform and development. Based on the theory of industrial organization, this paper uses DEA to estimate the industry performance of civil aviation service industry, and then uses the data of civil aviation service industry in China and Southeast Asia from 2001 to 2011 as a sample and uses double difference method. The relationship between deregulation and industrial performance is studied empirically. The conclusions of this paper are as follows: (1) the change of industrial restructuring has no significant impact on industrial performance in the short term, but the long-term asset restructuring has a negative impact on industrial performance. It shows that the effect of direct government-led enterprise restructuring on industrial performance is very limited since 2002. (2) the impact of market opening on industrial performance is significant in the short-term and long-term (3) the competition among civil aviation enterprises is more reflected in the expansion of the market, Incremental competition replaces stock competition. Having more production capacity and more line management rights become the main factor to occupy this market. Scale competition has replaced price competition as the main tool of civil aviation market competition. The empirical results reflect the characteristics of China's civil aviation industry, which is dominated by scale expansion and market expansion, and also reflects the general logic and mode of gradual reform of civil aviation industry in the path of deregulation and marketization. It is considered that further deregulation of price, line management, opening up of fuel market and low airspace market, strengthening airport supervision, rebuilding aviation industry control system and airspace resource control system will be the trend of further reform of aviation industry in the future.
【学位授予单位】：北京交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：F562

【相似文献】