基于区域寡占垄断市场结构的煤炭企业社会责任成本分析

发布时间：2018-03-08 12:08

本文选题：区域寡占市场　切入点：完全竞争　出处：《中国矿业》2013年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本文提出如果煤炭产业处于完全竞争市场结构下,则煤炭企业无力承担社会责任成本;而在区域寡头垄断市场结构下,煤炭企业有能力承担社会责任成本。本文运用弯折的需求曲线、价格领导模式和卡特尔模式对此加以论证和说明。弯折的需求曲线证明,只要煤炭企业承担社会责任成本后,使其边际成本曲线的变动没有超出一定范围时,则煤炭企业的最优价格和最优产量决策始终不变;价格领导模式说明,如果领袖企业首先承担一定的社会责任成本,并且内化在其成本中,这样其产品的价格就会升高,因此,其产品定价策略就定位在较高价格,然后其他企业跟进定价;卡特尔模式说明,如果存在区域煤炭卡特尔,煤炭企业承担社会责任成本的可行性就比较大,因为煤炭卡特尔内各个煤炭企业在承担社会责任成本后,他们可以通过共同价格、总的产量和各自的产量的变化来消化社会责任成本,而不影响其利润。
[Abstract]:This paper proposes that if the coal industry is in a completely competitive market structure, then the coal enterprises are unable to bear the cost of social responsibility, while in the regional oligopoly market structure, Coal enterprises have the ability to bear the cost of social responsibility. This paper uses the curved demand curve, price leadership model and cartel model to demonstrate and explain this. The bent demand curve proves that as long as coal enterprises bear the cost of social responsibility, If the change of marginal cost curve does not exceed a certain range, the decision of optimal price and optimal output of coal enterprise will always remain unchanged; the price leadership model states that if the leading enterprise bears a certain cost of social responsibility first, And internalize it in its cost, so that the price of its product will rise, so that its product pricing strategy is positioned at a higher price, and then other firms follow up on pricing; the cartel model states that if there is a regional coal cartel, It is more feasible for coal enterprises to bear the cost of social responsibility, because after each coal enterprise in the coal cartel has assumed the cost of social responsibility, they can adopt a common price. Changes in total production and respective yields to digest social responsibility costs without affecting their profits.
【作者单位】：中国矿业大学(北京)管理学院;华北科技学院;
【分类号】：F426.21;F406.72

【参考文献】