平遥古城与水原华城旅游资源开发模式的比较研究

发布时间：2018-01-04 13:38

本文关键词：平遥古城与水原华城旅游资源开发模式的比较研究　出处：《烟台大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：世界文化遗产因其独特的自然和人文景观，在人类的精神和文化传承方面有着不可替代的作用．世界文化遗产的旅游开发和保护的矛盾是中国世界文化遗产地实现可持续发展的核心问题．近年来，世界文化遗产的旅游开发已成为趋势。中韩两国也致力于此。中国的平遥古城和韩国的水原华城都是封建时期的古城遗迹，且同在1997年12月被联合国教科文组织评为世界文化遗产。从此以后，两座古城的旅游业更是繁荣发展起来。尤其是，平遥古城近几年旅游业迅猛发展，旅游门票收入一项几次突破亿元大关。但是我们也看到，平遥古城旅游业在创造巨大经济效益的同时，古城旅游市场也乱象丛生：旅游商品单一，旅游体验活动不足、游客满意度低等问题渐渐凸显。这些问题都反映出平遥古城旅游开发模式的不科学。国内也有一些学者认识到平遥在旅游发展方面的一些具体问题，并开始了有针对性的研究。然而通过与同类旅游资源进行比较研究的论文仍未出现。本文的研究可以填补这一研究空白。水原华城虽在规模上不如平遥古城，但是在旅游发展模式上，水原华城却有很多好的经验和做法值得平遥古城学习借鉴。水原华城不致力于吸引大规模游客，而是通过有计划的举办各类体验和主题活动，让每一位游客都能深感受其作为世界文化遗产的文化气息和魅力。做到了旅游开发与保护和谐共存。因此，本文以平遥古城与水原华城为研究对象，根据国家对旅游资源的分类标准，分三个方面对两座古城的旅游资源及其开发模式作了对比研究，即从遗址遗迹和建筑设施类、旅游商品类、人文活动类这三个方面，找出了平遥古城在旅游资源开发模式方面的问题与不足。并根据水原华城的成功经验，就每一类旅游资源都提出了可行的改善方案。希望这篇论文能够为平遥古城的进一步可持续发展起到积极的促进作用。
[Abstract]:Because of its unique natural and cultural landscape, the World Cultural Heritage. There is an irreplaceable role in the spiritual and cultural heritage of mankind. The contradiction between the tourism development and the protection of the world cultural heritage is the core issue for the sustainable development of the Chinese world cultural heritage in recent years. Tourism development of the world cultural heritage has become a trend. China and South Korea are also committed to this. The ancient cities of Pingyao in China and Shuiyuanhua in South Korea are relics of the feudal period. In December 1997, UNESCO named the World Cultural Heritage. Since then, the tourism industry of the two ancient cities has been booming. Especially, Pingyao ancient city has developed rapidly in recent years. But we also see that Pingyao ancient city tourism creates huge economic benefits at the same time, the ancient city tourism market is also chaotic: tourism commodities are single. The problems of insufficient tourism experience and low tourist satisfaction are all reflected in the unscientific tourism development model of Pingyao ancient city. There are also some scholars in China who recognize the specific problems of Pingyao in tourism development. And began a targeted study. But through the comparative study of similar tourism resources has not yet appeared. This study can fill in this research blank. Although the scale of Shuiyuan Huacheng is not as Pingyao ancient city. However, in the tourism development model, Shuiyuan Huacheng has a lot of good experiences and practices worth learning from the ancient city of Pingyao. Shuiyuan Huacheng is not committed to attracting large-scale tourists. By organizing various experiences and theme activities in a planned way, every tourist can feel deeply influenced by their cultural atmosphere and charm as a world cultural heritage, so that tourism development and protection coexist harmoniously. Therefore, this article takes Pingyao ancient city and Shuiyuanhua city as the research object, according to the national classification standard of the tourism resources, has made the contrast research to the two ancient cities' tourism resources and its development pattern in three aspects. Namely from the ruins and construction facilities category, tourism commodity category, the humanities activity category these three aspects, has found out Pingyao ancient city in the tourism resources development pattern aspect question and the insufficiency, and according to the Shuiyuan Huacheng successful experience. It is hoped that this paper will play a positive role in promoting the further sustainable development of Pingyao ancient city.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：F592.7;F593.126

【相似文献】