地质公园解说系统评价研究

发布时间：2018-01-24 18:22

本文关键词： 旅游解说系统地质公园解说系统评价指标体系华蓥山国家地质公园　出处：《重庆师范大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：地质公园作为一种新型的旅游目的地，解说系统是地质公园重要的组成部分，也是地质公园能否发挥其功能的重要保障。我国学者对地质公园解说系统的研究处于起步阶段，研究基本围绕地质公园解说系统构建与规划上，对地质公园解说系统评价方面的研究，还处于空白状态。笔者认为，对地质公园解说系统的评价，不仅能了解到公园解说系统的现状，还能从评价的结果上总结出地质公园解说系统薄弱之处，为后面完善和规划地质公园解说系统提供直接的依据。本文通过阅读国内外有旅游解说系统以及地质公园解说系统两方面的文献，总结出本研究有关地质公园解说系统的概念，特征、分类，以及明确地质公园解说系统评价的功能、准则以及评价方法。为建立地质公园评价指标体系提供理论依据。在与专家学者探讨下，结合实践经验，遵循一定的原则，总结出地质公园解说系统评价指标45个。通过专家咨询，设置问卷，对指标进行两轮筛选，最终确定评价指标20个。运用层次分析法，建立地质公园解说系统体系层次结构模型，设置问卷，构造成对比较矩阵，使用Matlab7.1软件确定各指标的权重系数。参照2010年地质公园规划修编技术要求，运用Likert five points Scale对各项指标进行量化，并明确了各指标量化的标准。构建了地质公园解说系统多目标层次线形函数评价模型，划分出地质公园解说评价得分等级。本文以华蓥山国家地质公园解说系统为实证研究对象，游客对公园内人员解说、解说牌示、出版物以及地质博物馆四大类解说系统作出评价。运用SPSS18.0描述性统计分析受访游客的社会特征、游客对四大类解说的评价均值以及均值标准差，同时运用描述性统计分析影响指标均值低、标准差大的游客社会特征因素。根据地质公园解说系统评价线形函数模型，算出地质公园四大类解说的得分以及整体得分。得分显示：游客对华蓥山地质公园解说系统比较满意。在结果的基础上，对华蓥山地质公园解说系统的优化提出建议。最后，总结了本文的创新之处，以及本研究中的不足之处，对今后的研究提出了一定的讨论。
[Abstract]:As a new type of tourist destination, the interpretation system is an important part of geopark. It is also an important guarantee of whether the geopark can play its function. The research on the interpretation system of geopark is still in its infancy, and the research is centered on the construction and planning of the interpretation system of geopark. The research on the evaluation of the interpretation system of the geopark is still blank. The author believes that the evaluation of the interpretation system of the geopark can not only understand the current situation of the interpretation system of the park, but also sum up the weakness of the interpretation system of the geopark from the evaluation results. It provides a direct basis for improving and planning the interpretation system of geopark. This article through reading the domestic and foreign tourism interpretation system and the geopark interpretation system two aspects of literature, summed up this research about the concept, characteristics, classification of the geopark interpretation system. The function, criterion and evaluation method of the evaluation system of geopark explanation system are clarified, which provides the theoretical basis for the establishment of the evaluation index system of geopark. In the discussion with experts and scholars, combined with practical experience, followed certain principles, summed up the geological park interpretation system evaluation index 45. Through expert consultation, set up a questionnaire, the indicators for two rounds of screening. Finally, 20 evaluation indexes were determined. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to establish the hierarchy structure model of the interpretation system of the geopark, to set up the questionnaire, and to construct a pair comparison matrix. Using Matlab7.1 software to determine the weight coefficient of each index. According to the technical requirements of the geopark planning revision in 2010. Likert five points Scale was used to quantify the indexes. The evaluation model of multi-objective hierarchical linear function of geopark interpretation system is constructed and the score grade of geopark interpretation evaluation is divided. This paper takes the interpretation system of Huaying Mountain National Geopark as the empirical research object, tourists explain the park personnel, explanation signs. Using SPSS18.0 descriptive statistics to analyze the social characteristics of the tourists, the average value and standard deviation of the tourists' evaluation of the four categories of interpretation. At the same time, using descriptive statistics to analyze the social characteristics of tourists with low mean value and large standard deviation. According to the interpretation system of geopark, the linear function model is evaluated. The scores show that the tourists are satisfied with the interpretation system of Huaying Mountain Geopark. On the basis of the results. Some suggestions for optimizing the interpretation system of Huaying Mountain Geopark are put forward. Finally, this paper summarizes the innovation of this paper, as well as the shortcomings of this study, and puts forward some discussions for future research.
【学位授予单位】：重庆师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：F592

【参考文献】