晋初礼制与司马氏帝室——《大晋龙兴皇帝三临辟雍碑》胜义蠡测

发布时间：2018-04-13 14:40

本文选题：晋辟雍碑 + 乡饮酒礼　；参考：《学术月刊》2013年10期

【摘要】：《大晋龙兴皇帝三临辟雍碑》出土于1931年,该年底即有余嘉锡、顾廷龙等名家撰文考证碑文、碑阴名录等史实。此后中日学者多有论述,胜义发挥无遗,似无多矣。然有两"不可解"之处为余嘉锡等先儒及中日时贤所未及。其一"不可解":古来仅有皇帝"临辟雍",皇太子断无临辟雍之礼,何以《晋辟雍碑》记载皇太子司马衷两次莅之?其二"不可解":《仪礼·乡饮酒礼》为士大夫之礼,古来无皇帝亲行之例,何以晋武帝为之?研究发现两个"不可解"背后体现了作为河内大士族成员的西晋武帝司马炎处于六朝初期的时代大变局中,对士族群体之微妙态度,及其为保护即将成为第二任皇帝的太子司马衷而采取之种种经学制度上的因变措施之原因。
[Abstract]:In 1931, Emperor Longxing and other famous scholars such as Jiaxi and Gu Tinglong wrote articles and textual research on inscriptions and inscriptions, which were unearthed in 1931.Since then, scholars in China and Japan have discussed, victory and justice to play fully, it seems that there is no more.However, there are two "insoluble" places such as Yu Jiaxi Confucianism and the Chinese and Japanese sages.One "incomprehensible": in ancient times only the emperor "to Piayong", the Prince did not face the ceremony of the emperor, why "Jin Yongbei" recorded Prince Sima Jin two times to the scene?Second, "incomprehensible": "Yi Li Xiang Li Li Li" for the ceremonial officials, in ancient times without the emperor's own practice, why did Emperor Jin Wu?The study found that the two "insolvable" reflected the subtle attitude of the Western Jin Wu Emperor Simayan, a member of the Hanoi Great Scholars, in the great changes of the times in the early period of the six dynasties.And the reasons for the changes in the Confucian system adopted to protect the Prince Sima, who will soon become the second emperor.
【作者单位】：南京大学文学院;
【分类号】：K877.45

【参考文献】