“AA”制自助游户外运动事故法律争议探析
发布时间:2019-04-09 15:43
【摘要】:"AA"制自助游户外运动逐渐风靡的同时也带来居高不下的事故发生率,遇难者家属往往会诉诸法律要求活动发起人及同行者承担责任、赔偿损失,法院的判决也不尽相同,由此引起社会的广泛关注和学术界的激烈争论。如何判断事故责任,公平合理地解决此类事故的纠纷,成为保护当事人合法权益和此类户外运动开展的重要问题。从法律视角梳理"AA"制自助游户外运动的事故争议,理清责任归属的有关问题,并提出相应的解决建议。
[Abstract]:While the "AA" system of self-help outdoor sports has gradually become popular, it has also brought about a high incidence of accidents, and the families of the victims often resort to law to demand that the promoters and colleagues of the activities bear the responsibility and compensate for the losses, and the court decisions are not always the same. This causes the society widespread concern and the academic circles intense debate. How to judge the liability of accidents and solve the disputes fairly and reasonably has become an important issue to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties and the development of this kind of outdoor sports. From the legal angle of view, this paper combs the accident dispute of the "AA" self-help outdoor sports, clears up the related problems of the responsibility attribution, and puts forward the corresponding solving suggestions.
【作者单位】: 天津体育学院研究生部;天津体育学院院长办公室;
【分类号】:D922.16;G895
[Abstract]:While the "AA" system of self-help outdoor sports has gradually become popular, it has also brought about a high incidence of accidents, and the families of the victims often resort to law to demand that the promoters and colleagues of the activities bear the responsibility and compensate for the losses, and the court decisions are not always the same. This causes the society widespread concern and the academic circles intense debate. How to judge the liability of accidents and solve the disputes fairly and reasonably has become an important issue to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties and the development of this kind of outdoor sports. From the legal angle of view, this paper combs the accident dispute of the "AA" self-help outdoor sports, clears up the related problems of the responsibility attribution, and puts forward the corresponding solving suggestions.
【作者单位】: 天津体育学院研究生部;天津体育学院院长办公室;
【分类号】:D922.16;G895
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 韦国猛;;违反安全保障义务侵权责任浅析——以《最高人民法院关于审理人身损害赔偿案件适用法律若干问题的解释》第六条为中心[J];安徽大学法律评论;2008年01期
2 侯国跃;;论“驴友”遇险事件的民事责任[J];重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版);2010年01期
3 石春玲;;论侵权法上的“伙伴”救助义务[J];法学杂志;2010年09期
4 蒙晓阳;余兵;;自助游驴友应否互负安全保障义务?——以广西南宁“中国驴友第一案”两审判决为例[J];广西政法管理干部学院学报;2010年02期
5 赵海萍;;关于我国民法中“公平责任”的若干思考——兼评《民法通则》第132条之规定[J];哈尔滨学院学报;2007年05期
6 张力;刘中杰;;户外自助旅游遇险事件法律分析——从“南宁7.9案”到“重庆7.11事件”[J];广西社会科学;2010年05期
7 刘惠芹;;户外自助旅游风险责任的法律分析[J];天津市经理学院学报;2009年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 崔荣伟;自助游组织者的法律责任分析[D];暨南大学;2009年
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 孙维飞;;通说与语词之争——以有关公平责任的争论为个案[J];北大法律评论;2011年02期
2 黄娟;;非婚生子女认领制度比较研究——兼及立法建议[J];比较法研究;2006年04期
3 吴O途,
本文编号:2455305
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/lyjj/2455305.html