农村宅基地使用权流转模式比较分析

发布时间：2018-04-02 17:11

本文选题：宅基地　切入点：宅基地使用权　出处：《四川师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：农村宅基地是农村土地中的重要部分,是农民基于居住的目的,申请建造住宅而使用的集体土地,农民享有使用权。一方面,我国法律限制了宅基地使用权的流转,引起了宅基地大量闲置、“空心村”现象等问题;另一方面,城镇化进程对土地资源的需求日益增长。为了集约利用土地,优化资源配置,我们国家从2004年的《国发[2004]28号》文件开始到2017年的中央一号文件,期间颁布了多项关于宅基地制度改革等一系列政策文件,来加强农村宅基地使用权的合法流转,并在中央政策的指导下,各地都在积极探索有效的宅基地使用权流转试点。本文通过总结现有宅基地使用权流转试点模式,按照流转价格制定的主体对其分类,分为政府主导型、市场主导型、农民集体主导型三种流转模式,结合制度变迁理论对各模式的制度变迁动因和制度供给主体进行比较分析,得出政府主导型和市场主导型流转模式的制度变迁路径是强制性制度变迁路径,农民集体主导型流转模式是诱致性制度变迁路径的结论,并结合流转试点案例对三种模式的运行机制、成本分担和收益分配进行比较,从制度环境、制度内容以及制度效率进行总结,从不同的角度考虑,不同的流转模式各有利弊,因此在当前的国情背景下,应因地制宜的并审慎稳妥的进行宅基地使用权流转试点,并通过相关政策将各种流转模式进行完善,确保农民利益,从而促进宅基地使用权的流转。
[Abstract]:The rural homestead is an important part of the rural land. It is the collective land used by the peasants for the purpose of living, and the peasants have the right to use it.On the one hand, the law of our country has restricted the circulation of the right to use the homestead, which has caused a large number of idle homestead, "hollow village" and other problems; on the other hand, the demand for land resources in the process of urbanization is increasing day by day.In order to make intensive use of land and optimize the allocation of resources, our country began from the document "Guofa [2004] 28" in 2004 to the first document of the Central Committee in 2017, during which a number of policy documents on the reform of the homestead system were promulgated.To strengthen the legal circulation of rural homestead use right, and under the guidance of central policy, all localities are actively exploring effective homestead use right transfer pilot.This paper summarizes the existing land use right transfer pilot model, according to the circulation price of the main body of the classification, divided into government-led, market-oriented, farmers collective dominated three circulation models,Combining with the theory of institutional change, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the drivers of institutional change and the main body of institutional supply of each mode, and concludes that the path of institutional change of government-led and market-oriented circulation mode is compulsory institutional vicissitude.The farmer collective dominant circulation mode is the conclusion that induces the institutional change path, and unifies the circulation pilot case to carry on the comparison to the three modes' operation mechanism, the cost sharing and the income distribution, from the system environment,The content of the system and the efficiency of the system are summarized. Considering from different angles, different circulation modes have their own advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, under the background of the current national conditions, we should carry out pilot projects of the circulation of the right to use the homestead in accordance with local conditions and prudently and steadily.And through the relevant policies to improve the circulation model, to ensure the interests of farmers, thereby promoting the circulation of homestead use rights.
【学位授予单位】：四川师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：F321.1

【参考文献】