论“三权分置”的制度实现:权属定位及路径依赖

发布时间：2018-04-30 11:33

本文选题：三权分置 + 承包权　；参考：《南京农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：以"三权分置"地方实践和相关政策性文件为依据,厘析农民(农户)承包权权利属性的理论争议,揭示农民(农户)承包权的二元属性,或为成员权,或为物权,并证成"三权分置"有两类实现形式。以"三权分置"的政策目标要求和土地经营权功能定位为起点,论证土地经营权物权塑造的必要性,并从物权理论和立法技术两个方面,证成土地经营权物权塑造的可行性。在此基础上,结合制度演进的一般方法论、规范调整对象、制度可塑性以及制度变革必要性等因素,进一步揭示"三权分置"制度实现的路径依赖是立足于既存法制的适度制度创新。而适度创新的内容,则是解释论语境下的集体成员权细致化表达和立法论视域下的土地经营权物权塑造。
[Abstract]:Based on the local practice and relevant policy documents of "three rights division", this paper analyzes the theoretical dispute on the attributes of peasants'(farmers') contractual rights, and reveals the dualistic attributes of peasants'(peasant households) contracting rights, either as members' rights or as real rights. There are two kinds of realization forms of "three rights separate structure". Based on the policy objective and the function orientation of the land management right, this paper demonstrates the necessity of shaping the real right of the land management right, and proves the feasibility of the real right molding of the land management right from the two aspects of real right theory and legislation technology. On this basis, combining with the general methodology of institutional evolution, regulating the adjustment object, institutional plasticity and the necessity of institutional change, etc. It is further revealed that the path dependence of the realization of the system is based on the moderate institutional innovation of the existing legal system. The content of moderate innovation is the detailed expression of collective membership right in the context of interpretation and the creation of real right of land management right in the perspective of legislative theory.
【作者单位】：成都大学政治学院;四川文化产业职业学院文化商学院;
【基金】：四川省社会科学规划项目“民法典编纂与集体土地权利建构研究”(SC16B004) 成都市哲学社会科学规划研究项目“新型城镇化与农村土地制度改革研究”(2016Z43) 成都大学引进人才启动项目“空间利用视域下的宅基地使用权设置”
【分类号】：F321.1

【相似文献】