广东农村公共物品供给的收入效应研究
发布时间:2018-05-23 23:48
本文选题:农村公共物品供给 + 生产性公共物品 ; 参考:《广东财经大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:广东是我国经济大省,一直以来,农业在广东经济中占据不可或缺的地位。农村公共物品供给是解决“三农问题”、促进农民增产增收的重要措施。目前,广东农村公共物品存在供给不足、质量不高、区域差异明显、供给效率较低等问题,已经成为制约广东农村经济发展和新农村建设的主要障碍。研究农村公共物品和农民收入的关系,切实有效地增加农村公共物品供给,提高农民收入,是目前亟待解决的问题。首先,本研究在梳理相关理论和国内外文献的基础上,首先描述了广东农田水利基础设施、农业技术推广、信息平台建设、农村教育、农村医疗卫生和农村社会保障等农村公共物品供给和农民收入现状,探讨供给过程存在的不足,发现广东农村物品普遍存在投入不够、维修管理不善和区域差异较大,农民收入城乡区域差异显著等问题。进而通过对公共物品供给的收入效应的经济学研究,推导出农村生产性公共物品和非生产性公共物品对农民收入的影响机理,并运用单位根检验、协整检验、格兰杰因果检验实证分析农村生产性公共物品和非生产性公共物品供给对农民收入的影响。实证结果表明:农村生产性公共物品供给可以增加农民收入,收入弹性为0.05;非生产性物品供给也对农民收入有促进关系,收入弹性为0.24。然后运用案例分析比较河源市三个村落农村公共物品供给和农民收入情况,进一步探讨农村公共物品供给的收入效应。其次,经过上述分析,本研究得出以下结论:(1)农村生产性公共物品和非生产性公共物品供给都能促进农民收入增长,且非生产性农村公共物品促进作用较强;(2)农村生产性公共物品的一次性投入并不能有效改变生产情况,需持续性、长期性投入;(3)健康的供给制度和农民对公共物品收益的可视性能增加农民投入公共物品的积极性;(4)多元主体供给农村公共物品效率更高。最后,结合全文分析,针对性提出对策和建议,主要包括:(1)加大农村非生产性公共物品财政投入力度;(2)加强农村生产性公共物品持续投入能力;(3)提高农民公民意识和公共意识;(4)规范农村公共物品的维护、监督机制等。
[Abstract]:Guangdong is a major economic province in China, agriculture has been an indispensable position in Guangdong economy. The supply of rural public goods is an important measure to solve the problem of agriculture, countryside and farmers. At present, the problems of insufficient supply, low quality, obvious regional difference and low efficiency of supply in Guangdong rural public goods have become the main obstacle to the development of rural economy and the construction of new countryside in Guangdong province. It is an urgent problem to study the relationship between rural public goods and farmers' income, to increase the supply of rural public goods and to raise farmers' income. First of all, on the basis of combing relevant theories and domestic and foreign literature, this study first describes the infrastructure of farmland and water conservancy in Guangdong, agricultural technology extension, information platform construction, rural education. The present situation of rural public goods supply and farmers' income, such as rural medical and health care and rural social security, is discussed in this paper. It is found that there are insufficient input, poor maintenance and management and large regional differences in the supply process of rural goods in Guangdong Province. The difference between rural and urban areas of farmers' income is significant and so on. Then through the economic research on the income effect of public goods supply, the paper deduces the influence mechanism of rural productive public goods and unproductive public goods on farmers' income, and applies unit root test and cointegration test. Granger causality test empirically analyzes the effect of the supply of rural productive public goods and unproductive public goods on farmers' income. The empirical results show that the supply of rural productive public goods can increase the income of farmers, the income elasticity is 0.05, and the supply of non-productive goods can promote the income of farmers, the income elasticity is 0.24. Then the paper analyzes and compares the rural public goods supply and farmers' income in three villages of Heyuan City by case study, and further discusses the income effect of rural public goods supply. Secondly, through the above analysis, this study draws the following conclusion: 1) the supply of both rural productive public goods and unproductive public goods can promote the growth of farmers' income. Moreover, the one-off input of non-productive rural public goods can not effectively change the production situation, and it needs to be sustained, and the promotion effect of non-productive rural public goods is stronger than that of non-productive rural public goods. (3) healthy supply system and farmers' visibility to public goods can increase the enthusiasm of farmers to invest in public goods. 4) the efficiency of multiple subjects in supplying rural public goods is higher. Finally, combined with the full text analysis, targeted countermeasures and suggestions, The main contents include: 1) increasing the financial input of unproductive public goods in rural areas; (2) strengthening the ability of sustained input of rural productive public goods; (3) raising the awareness of citizens and public consciousness of farmers; (4) standardizing the maintenance and supervision mechanism of rural public goods, and so on.
【学位授予单位】:广东财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F327
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杜威漩;;农村税费改革对小农水治理的引致效应探析[J];学习论坛;2017年02期
2 吴比;尹燕飞;徐雪高;;农民收入增长区域结构与空间效应——基于农村固定观察点数据[J];农村经济;2017年01期
3 昌忠泽;;财政分权促进了地方公共物品供给效率的提高吗?——以北京市为例的实证分析[J];吉首大学学报(社会科学版);2017年01期
4 潘胜楠;;农村公共物品供给现状及对策研究[J];农村经济与科技;2016年21期
5 崔晓芳;;农村公共物品多元主体供给中的政府职能研究——基于新公共服务理论的视角[J];山西农业大学学报(社会科学版);2016年11期
6 邓大松;刘志甫;;我国农村公共物品有效供给问题与策论[J];江西社会科学;2016年10期
7 刘凤伟;;民间资本参与农村公共物品供给的公私合作机制研究[J];农业经济;2016年04期
8 周振;张琛;彭超;孔祥智;;农业机械化与农民收入:来自农机具购置补贴政策的证据[J];中国农村经济;2016年02期
9 杨剑;程勇;;农村公共物品多元协作供给的机制构建[J];农村经济;2014年12期
10 李广跃;;农村生产性公共物品供给与农民收入关系的实证研究[J];经济研究导刊;2014年06期
,本文编号:1926870
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/nongyejingjilunwen/1926870.html