农村转移人口市民化成本测算及其融资支持研究

发布时间：2018-06-05 21:24

本文选题：人口市民化 + 市民化成本　；参考：《湘潭大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来,新型城镇化这一国家方针政策的提出,使得城镇化在学术界又引起了广泛的研究。然而,近年来我国学者对城镇化问题的研究主要都集中在经济增长、人口迁移、国家财政支持等方面对城镇化的影响研究,对人口市民化及其成本的研究较少。国外的研究由于国情的不同也由于国情不同、户籍制度不同而对成本研究的少之又少。本文以湖南农村外出务工人员作为研究的主体,对湖南农村外出务工人员在工资待遇、受教育程度、外出务工地区等方面进行了分析。通过分析发现湖南农村转移人口在工资待遇上虽然有所提高,但是与城镇居民收入仍然有差距。农村转移人口在受教育程度上大多数还集中在初中教育水平,显示受教育程度不够。外出务工地区虽然仍然主要流入广州,但农村转移人口在省内务工的比例不断上升表明存在农村外出务工人口回流的情况。其次,通过对我国户籍制度政策变迁的整理,对我国与美国、日本、加拿大的户籍政策进行比较,发现我国在户籍制度上与其他国家存在的差异,并发现制度因素是导致我国的城镇人口的待遇与美、日、加拿大的人口不同的直接原因。对于这一问题,人口的市民化,即城镇化率与户籍城镇化率之间存在的缺口缩小是对此问题的解决办法。在转变过程中,所需要支出的成本是本文研究的重点。本文研究的主体是湖南农村外出务工人口,主要是对省内农村转移人口流入的主要城市长沙市进行市民化成本的测算,并探讨其融资支持的渠道。在研究过程中,主要对2012-2014年的长沙统计年鉴的统计数据进行整理、测算。通过研究发现,长沙市农村转移人口的农村转移人口市民化成本总成本为74599.71元,其中个人成本为22077.29元,公共成本为52522.42元。农村转移人口的个人成本在融资方面主要是需要依赖普惠金融的支持,而公共成本首先可以通过中央政府每年的财政拨款、引入外商、买卖土地使用权等方式进行融资。
[Abstract]:In recent years, new urbanization, a national policy, has caused extensive research in academia. However, in recent years, the researches on urbanization are mainly focused on the economic growth, population migration, national financial support and other aspects of the impact of urbanization. Because of the different national conditions and the different national conditions, the research on cost is rare in foreign countries. In this paper, Hunan rural migrant workers as the main body of research, Hunan rural migrant workers in the pay, education, migrant areas and other aspects were analyzed. Through the analysis, it is found that although the salary of the rural migrant population in Hunan has been improved, there is still a gap between the income of the rural migrant population and that of the urban residents. Most of the rural migrant population in the education level also concentrated in the junior high school education level, indicating that the education level is not enough. Although migrant workers still mainly flow into Guangzhou, the increasing proportion of rural migrant workers in the province indicates that the rural migrant workers return to Guangzhou. Secondly, through sorting out the changes of the household registration policy of our country, this paper compares the household registration policy of our country with that of the United States, Japan and Canada, and finds out the differences between China and other countries in the household registration system. It is found that institutional factors are the direct reasons for the difference between the treatment of urban population in China and those in America, Japan and Canada. The solution to this problem is to narrow the gap between the urbanization rate and the household registration urbanization rate. In the process of transformation, the cost of expenditure is the focus of this paper. The main body of this study is the rural migrant worker population in Hunan Province, mainly for the main city Changsha City, which is the main city of Hunan province, and the financing support channels are discussed. In the course of the research, the statistical data of Changsha Statistical Yearbook from 2012 to 2014 are sorted out and calculated. It is found that the total cost of rural population transfer in Changsha is 74599.71 yuan, of which the personal cost is 22077.29 yuan and the public cost is 52522.42 yuan. The personal cost of rural population transfer mainly depends on the support of inclusive finance in financing, and the public cost can be financed by the central government's annual financial allocation, the introduction of foreign investors, the purchase and sale of land use rights and so on.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：F323.6;F299.2

【相似文献】