对贫困类型划分的再认识及其政策意义

发布时间：2018-06-17 04:42

本文选题：贫困类型划分 + 收入性贫困　；参考：《社会科学家》2017年06期

【摘要】：科学的贫困类型划分是正确落实分类扶持工作机制的关键环节。虽然学术界关于贫困类型划分的研究已形成了"成因分类说"、"性质分类说"、"程度分类说"三种代表性学术观点,但是从实践指导意义来看,它们都不利于正确落实精准扶贫中的分类扶持工作。要正确落实精准扶贫中的分类扶持工作,就必须对贫困类型划分进行再认识,必须凸显贫困类型划分的实践指导意义。要凸显贫困类型划分的实践指导意义,就必须凸显贫困类型划分的综合性、动态性和简约性。从贫困类型划分的综合性、动态性和简约性三个基本要求看,可以将贫困划分为收入性贫困和支出性贫困两种类型。对贫困类型划分进行再认识的政策意义在于:一是要以消除收入性贫困为目标,着力提高农村贫困人口的工资性收入和资产性收入;二是要以减少支出性贫困为目标,着力提高农村社会保障制度的契合度。
[Abstract]:Scientific classification of poverty types is a key link in correctly implementing the work mechanism of classification and support. Although the academic research on the classification of poverty types has formed three representative academic viewpoints, they are the theory of origin classification, the theory of nature classification and the theory of degree classification. They are not conducive to the correct implementation of precision poverty reduction in the classification of support work. In order to correctly carry out the classification and support work in accurate poverty alleviation, we must re-recognize the classification of poverty types and highlight the practical guiding significance of the classification of poverty types. In order to highlight the practical guiding significance of poverty classification, it is necessary to highlight the comprehensive, dynamic and concise nature of poverty classification. From the three basic requirements of comprehensive, dynamic and simple, poverty can be divided into two types: income poverty and expenditure poverty. The policy significance of rethinking the division of poverty types lies in: first, to eliminate income poverty, and to focus on raising the wage and asset income of the rural poor; and second, to reduce the expenditure poverty. Efforts will be made to improve the compatibility of the rural social security system.
【作者单位】：江西财经大学财税与公共管理学院;
【基金】：江西省自然科学基金项目:“江西省精准扶贫资源配置的‘内卷化’困境;矫正机制设计及政策调整研究”,项目编号20171BAA208024 江西全面建成小康社会决策支持协同创新中心2016年招标重点项目:“江西省国定贫困县脱贫摘帽的对策研究”,项目编号:XKZXZD20171002
【分类号】：F323.8

【相似文献】