退耕还林不同林种的农户可持续生计研究

发布时间：2018-07-16 15:41

【摘要】：基于临汾市安泽县冀氏镇沟口村(退耕还生态林)和吉县车城乡车城村(退耕还经济林)退耕还林的实地调查数据,运用的框架为国际上比较常用的研究生态工程影响的可持续生计框架,并建立了相对应的关于生计状况评价的一系列指标体系。本文从生计资本、生计策略、生计结果三个方面对沟口村(退耕还生态林)和车城村(退耕还经济林)的数据进行了比较研究,发现两者之间的差异与各自存在的不足,并对该工程后续相关政策的期望几个方面进行了研究和叙述,并提出相关建议。最后分析得出了如下几个主要结论:(1)生计资本比较方面,沟口村在自然资本方面比车城村更为充足,车城村由于位于乡政府驻地,物质资本、人力资本和金融资本优于沟口村;社会资本方面差异不大。车城村由于优势的资本条件使得其生计策略和生计结果都比沟口村好一些。(2)两村农户的生计策略的方面,车城村由于其有利的地理位置和苹果产业,需要投入的劳动力较多,使得农户收入来源主要为农业和打工;而相对偏僻的沟口村因主要种植玉米而使农业收入占据了较大比例。(3)两村农户生计结果方面,车城村由于优势的资本条件使得其生计结果比沟口村好一些。无论是退耕农户的贫困率,还是非退耕农户的贫困率,车城村的农户贫困率都低于沟口村的。(4)两村绝大多数的农户都愿意维护已有的退耕还林成果,并且都对国家的补贴期限和资金不是太满意,希望以后能加大这方面的支持。最后,针对两村退耕还林存在的不足,提出相应的建议,希望为以后相关政策的发展提高现实意义。
[Abstract]:Based on the field investigation data of Goukou Village in Jishi Town, Anze County, Linfen City, and Checheng Village (returning farmland to Economic Forest) in Checheng and Rural areas of Ji County, Linfen City, The framework used is a sustainable livelihood framework which is commonly used in the world to study the impact of ecological engineering, and a series of index systems for the evaluation of livelihood status are established. This paper makes a comparative study on the data of Goukou Village (returning farmland to ecological forest) and Checheng Village (returning farmland to Economic Forest) from three aspects of livelihood capital, livelihood strategy and livelihood result, and finds out the difference between them and their respective shortcomings. This paper studies and narrates the expectation of the related policies of the project, and puts forward some relevant suggestions. Finally, the main conclusions are as follows: (1) compared with the natural capital, Goukou village is more abundant than the Checheng village in terms of natural capital, because it is located in the township government, the material capital, human capital and financial capital are better than the Goukou village; There is little difference in social capital. Because of the superior capital condition, Checheng Village has better livelihood strategy and livelihood result than Goukou Village. (2) because of its favorable location and apple industry, Checheng Village needs more labor force. The main sources of income for farmers are agriculture and employment, while the relatively remote Gokoukou village accounts for a large proportion of the agricultural income due to the main planting of corn. (3) the results of farmers' livelihood in the two villages, Checheng Village because of the advantages of capital conditions make its livelihood better than the Goukou Village. Whether it is the poverty rate of the returning farmers or the poverty rate of the non-returning farmers, the poverty rate of the rural households in Checheng Village is lower than that in the Goukou Village. (4) the vast majority of farmers in the two villages are willing to maintain the existing achievements in returning farmland to forests. And are not very satisfied with the duration of state subsidies and funding, hope to increase this support in the future. Finally, in view of the deficiency of returning farmland to forest in the two villages, the corresponding suggestions are put forward in order to improve the practical significance for the development of related policies in the future.
【学位授予单位】：山西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：F326.27;F323.6

【参考文献】