农村集体经营性建设用地入市途径选择研究——以黑龙江省安达市为例

发布时间：2018-08-26 09:21

【摘要】：党的十八届三中全会明确提出,允许农村集体经营性建设用地出让、租赁、入股,实行与国有土地同等入市、同权同价。与国有建设用地单一的入市途径不同,农村集体经营性建设用地有3种入市途径,即就地入市、调整入市和整治入市。由于农村集体经营性建设用地受城市经济辐射作用强弱不同,存量土地历史遗留问题较多,合理的选择入市途径有助于实现农村集体经营性建设用地的因地制宜入市和高效集约利用。在对农村集体经营性建设用地进行分类的基础上,从解决存量土地历史遗留问题视角和实现土地效益最大化视角分别进行入市途径选择。结果表明,为解决存量用地历史遗留问题,安达市98.25%的宗地应采用就地入市途径,1.75%的宗地应采用调整入市途径;为实现土地效益最大化,52.82%的宗地应采用就地入市途径,45.48%的宗地应采用整治入市途径,1.70%的宗地应采用调整入市途径。
[Abstract]:The third Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee explicitly proposed that the rural collective operating construction land should be sold, leased and invested, and that the market should be entered into the market on an equal footing with the state-owned land and at the same price as the right. Different from the single way of entering the market of the state-owned construction land, there are three ways to enter the market of the rural collective management construction land, that is, to enter the market on the spot, to adjust the market entry and to regulate the construction land to enter the market. Due to the fact that the rural collective operating construction land is strongly affected by urban economic radiation, there are many problems left over from the history of the stock of land. The reasonable choice of market access is helpful to realize the rural collective management construction land to enter the market according to the local conditions and to make efficient intensive use. On the basis of classifying the rural collective management construction land, this paper chooses the way to enter the market from the perspective of solving the historical problems left over by the stock land and realizing the maximization of the land benefit. The results show that in order to solve the problem left over by the history of stock land, 98.25% of the land in Anda should adopt the way of local market entry and 1.75% should adopt the way of readjusting the market. In order to maximize the land benefit, 52.82% of the parcels should adopt the way of entering the market on the spot (45.48%) and 1.70% of the parcels should adopt the way of adjusting the market.
【作者单位】：沈阳农业大学土地与环境学院;沈阳市土地整理中心;
【基金】：国家土地督察沈阳局项目(编号:SY2014-01、SY2015-01)
【分类号】：F321.1

【相似文献】