山区农民阶层分化、林地产权偏好与林地流转意愿研究
[Abstract]:Since the reform of the new collective forest rights system in 2003, the peasant household as the main body of the reform of the collective forest rights system, and also the main body of the trade in the forest land circulation market, its circulation will affect the circulation of the right to use the forest land. With the rapid development of the mountain economy and the pace of urbanization in our country, the farmer's employment path and the diversification of the source of income have formed different peasant stratum, and there may be a difference between the forest land circulation intention of different stratum farmers. The degree of dependence of land is different, that is, the different preference of forest land property right, may also appear as the difference of forest land circulation intention. In this paper, we hope to find the driving factors and limiting factors that affect the will of farmers' forest land circulation, and promote the further circulation of forest land. The data of 187 micro-farmers in 4 counties (cities) in Zhejiang Province were studied. Firstly, the status of peasant stratum differentiation in the sample area, the preference status of forest land and the will of forest land circulation will be described. The influence factors of farmer's forest land circulation will be analyzed by using the binary Logistic model. The following conclusions are obtained: With the development of mountain economy and the advance of urbanization, the former highly homogeneous group of farmers has begun to differentiate. The preference of farmers to forest land property rights system is different. Most farmers think forest land property rights are important. Among 187 households, 44. 92% of farmers have circulation will, 55. 08% of farmers want to remain unchanged, the number of farmers with forest land circulation will be less than the number of farmers who want to keep the same. The scale, time limit, motivation and so on are different from the farmers who have the desire to flow. Each occupation class has strong preference for various kinds of property rights in forestland. It is considered that the land use right and forest land mortgage are important, and the farmers account for the highest proportion; it is considered that the forest land usufruct is important, and the peasant households in the business class make up the highest proportion; it is considered that the forest land use right is important, the farmer accounts for the manager stratum is higher than the highest; it is considered important to inherit the forest land. The farmers in the farming class make up the highest. Farmers with different household income levels have strong preference for forest land property rights. And it is considered that the income right of forest land, the right of forest land and the inheritance of forest land are important, the household income level is at the lower level, the household income level is higher than the highest; it is considered that forest land mortgage is important, the household income level is at the lowest level, the farmer accounts for the highest proportion; it is considered that the preference of forest land use right is important, Household income levels are among the highest in middle-class households. The turnover intention of the business class and the manager class is stronger, the farming class and the worker class tend to keep the status quo. Among the farmers who are willing to flow into, the farmers account for the highest proportion; among the farmers who are willing to flow out, the farmers account for the highest proportion. Regardless of the level of household income, it is desirable to keep the same farmers in the majority. In the lower layer, the inflow intention of the upper and lower layers is stronger than the outflow intention, and the outflow intention of the middle layer and the middle layer is stronger than the inflow intention. Among the farmers who are willing to flow into, the upper-level farmers account for the highest proportion; among the farmers who are willing to flow out, middle-level farmers are the highest. Compared with the control group, the willingness of forestland outflow was stronger than that of the control group (the farming class). Compared with the control group (upper layer), the farmers whose household income is in the middle and lower levels has a stronger outflow intention. Compared with the control group (the upper layer), the outflow intention of the peasant households in the middle and lower layers is more intense, and Yongkang is used as a reference group and is opened, Linan's farmers are more inclined to flow out than Yongkang's farmers. In the model of farmer's forestland inflow will influence factor model, the age, per capita forest land area has a significant negative influence on the farmer's forestland inflow will. The household income level is in the middle-upper level, the farmers inflow will be weaker; open, Linan and Longquan farmer's inflow will be stronger than Yongkang's farmers. According to the above conclusions, the following suggestions are made: one is to establish and improve the forest rights management system and publish the circulation information. The second is to develop non-agricultural industries and raise farmers' income level. 3. To respect the will of farmers and encourage farmers to carry out forest land circulation.
【学位授予单位】:浙江农林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:F326.2;F832.4
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 徐秀英,沈月琴,万刚,徐有银;林地流转的难点、问题与对策——临安市林地流转的调查[J];浙江林业科技;2000年06期
2 罗运森 ,黎志永;加快林地流转步伐 促进产业化进程[J];广西林业;2003年06期
3 康敏卿;赣州市林地流转初探[J];江西林业科技;2004年04期
4 梁泽治;加强林地流转管理 实现资源优化配置[J];湖南林业;2004年10期
5 梁明莲 ,江明峻;林地流转的问题与对策[J];广西林业;2004年05期
6 王飞,万志芳,于志杰;论国有林地流转的必要性[J];中国林业企业;2005年02期
7 樊喜斌;;关于林地流转问题的探讨[J];林业资源管理;2006年04期
8 祝海波;;我国林地流转机理及制度思考[J];农村经济;2006年12期
9 祝海波;尹少华;;探索适合我国林地流转的基本制度[J];林业经济问题;2006年06期
10 邓章宁;;海南林地流转存在的问题及对策建议[J];热带林业;2007年04期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 张蕾;蔡志坚;;论林地流转中的制度失衡问题[A];第九届中国林业青年学术年会论文摘要集[C];2010年
2 廖文梅;彭泰中;曹建华;;农户林地流转行为影响因素的实证分析——以江西为例[A];低碳经济与林业发展论——中国林业学术论坛·第6辑[C];2009年
3 王耀冬;;关于林地流转问题的研究[A];林业、森林与野生动植物资源保护法制建设研究——2004年中国环境资源法学研讨会(年会)论文集(第一册)[C];2004年
4 季利民;;林地流转问题的研究与探讨[A];第二届浙江中西部科技论坛论文集(第一卷)[C];2005年
5 蔡志坚;;户林地流转行为决策过程模型与假说[A];第九届中国林业青年学术年会论文摘要集[C];2010年
6 孟繁民;张书坤;田林江;;宁安市国有林场林地流转的思考[A];黑龙江省林业经济学会2004年年会暨第四次学术研讨会论文集[C];2004年
7 盛建峰;刘金龙;骆耀峰;;林地流转纠纷的成因与思考——广西壮族自治区南宁横县的调研报告[A];第九届中国林业青年学术年会论文摘要集[C];2010年
8 孟凡民;李忠义;;宁安市国有森林林木林地流转试点工作初报[A];第九届中国林业青年学术年会论文摘要集[C];2010年
9 杜群;王兆平;;集体林权改革中林地流转规范的冲突与协调[A];生态文明与林业法治--2010全国环境资源法学研讨会(年会)论文集(上册)[C];2010年
10 曹兰芳;罗攀柱;任伟琳;;林地流转中林地使用权问题及对策[A];中国林业技术经济理论与实践[C];2006年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 陈作华 申有全;林地流转催发我市造林生机[N];焦作日报;2006年
2 通讯员 贺剑平;任振鹤到团风麻城督办林地流转工作[N];黄冈日报;2007年
3 记者 梁坚义邋实习生 陈攀 马先军;新政策助阳新林地流转[N];黄石日报;2008年
4 记者 成良田邋通讯员 李雪诚;杨芳林林地流转紧锣密鼓[N];咸宁日报;2008年
5 特约记者 任建成 通讯员 龙朝辉;嘉鱼:林地流转3万多亩[N];咸宁日报;2008年
6 记者 成良田 见习记者 朱哲;我市部署林地流转工作[N];咸宁日报;2008年
7 通讯员 闵劲华;赤壁:农民林地流转得实惠[N];咸宁日报;2008年
8 阮凤文 本报记者 刘凤娟;宁安敲响林地流转“第一槌”[N];黑龙江经济报;2008年
9 本报记者 朱邪;审议并原则通过《贵州省森林、林木、林地流转条例(草案)》[N];贵州日报;2010年
10 记者 郭树勋;龙翔街道:林地流转多[N];焦作日报;2010年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 冉陆荣;集体林权制度改革背景下辽宁省农户林地流转行为及经营效率研究[D];沈阳农业大学;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 杨松坤;农户林地流转行为实证研究[D];浙江农林大学;2010年
2 郑云青;江西省集体林地流转中的农户决策行为与政策优化研究[D];江西财经大学;2012年
3 李朝柱;农户林地流转及对家庭收入的影响研究[D];浙江农林大学;2012年
4 赵娜;林地流转对农户林地投入的影响研究[D];浙江农林大学;2012年
5 徐林青;江西省铜鼓县集体林地流转市场结构及成因分析[D];北京林业大学;2015年
6 刘大鹏;不同地区林地流转影响因素的比较研究[D];北京林业大学;2015年
7 严俊;南方集体林区林地流转研究[D];南京林业大学;2010年
8 赵海兰;云南省民族地区集体林权改革后的林地流转研究[D];西南林业大学;2013年
9 李红庆;南方集体林可持续经营林地流转政策与机制研究[D];中南林业科技大学;2009年
10 王飞;国有林地流转研究[D];东北林业大学;2005年
,本文编号:2267439
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/nongyejingjilunwen/2267439.html