农地承包权实施的非市场环境：内涵、感知与影响
发布时间：2019-01-17 09:11
【摘要】：当前对农地产权相关问题研究的过程中,多强调市场本位,而对非市场问题关注不够。据此,为厘清农地产权实施中非市场环境的存在及其影响,本文以“现象—现象感知—感知影响”为研究线索,以农地承包权非市场环境为研究对象,综合了主观与客观、定性与定量相结合的方法论,通过相关文献和理论的梳理对农地承包权的非市场环境做出了内涵界定,通过问卷调查和测量模型对农地承包权非市场环境农户感知做出实证测度,通过结构方程模型量化研究了农地承包权非市场环境农户感知对土地流转的影响。研究主要结论包括:⑴农地承包权的非市场环境是在一定的时间和空间范围内,农户、政府、非农民的涉农资本主动地、有目的地通过行政、关系等非市场手段对农地承包权的相关利益进行交易和配置时所持有的农地价值观念、态度和遵循的制度、伦理规范以及政治机制等因素构成的市场外部环境。⑵非市场环境的要素包括环境参与者以及参与者之间的相互联系与作用。农地承包权的非市场环境主体包括了农地承包权相关利益的个人、群体及组织。按非市场环境参与主体,可将当前农村农地承包权非市场环境分为政府行政干预、地方文化关联和社会组织参与三类。⑶农户对农地承包权的感知可分为对政府行政干预的感知、对地方文化关联的感知和对社会组织参与的感知,开发了相应的感知量表,量表α系数(0.803)和KMO值(0.792)通过了量表效度信度检验,因子分析结果表明测量模型可用。实证测度样区农户非市场感知程度权重大小关系为:政府行政干预(36.79%)地方文化关联(32.12%)社会组织参与(31.09%)。说明农户在承包权实施过程中感知最强烈的是政府行政干预。⑷农户对非市场环境的感知对土地流转具有重要影响,从单个角度看,内生变量的三种非市场环境感知对土地流转影响的路径系数为0.82、0.78、0.63,皆为正向影响,因此三种非市场环境感知均对土地流转其积极促进作用。从综合角度看,内生变量地方文化关联感知和政府行政干预感知、社会组织参与感知都存在负向影响关系,路径系数分别为-0.61,-0.52,这种感知代表了非市场环境间存在的冲突,而这种冲突的存在间接地抑制了土地流转。⑸针对非市场环境感知对土地流转的影响,本文政策建议如下:政府应深刻理解当前非市场环境的客观性以及三类非市场环境存在的冲突,在理解农民内生文化的基础上,合理介入农地使用权实施过程,且在介入过程中加强沟通理解以及相应的宣传效率,加强不同类别非市场环境的协同作用,可有效提高土地流转。
[Abstract]:In the current research process of farmland property right, the market standard is emphasized, but the non-market problem is not paid enough attention to. Accordingly, in order to clarify the existence and influence of non-market environment in the implementation of farmland property right, this paper takes "phenomenon-phenomenon perception-perceived impact" as the research clue, takes the non-market environment of farmland contract right as the research object, synthesizes the subjective and objective. The methodology of combining qualitative and quantitative methods defines the non-market environment of farmland contract right by combing relevant literature and theory. Through questionnaire survey and measurement model, this paper makes an empirical measure of farmers' perception of non-market environment of farmland contract right, and quantifies the influence of farmers' perception of non-market environment on land circulation through structural equation model. The main conclusions are as follows: 1 the non-market environment of farmland contract right is within a certain time and space, the agricultural capital of farmers, governments and non-farmers actively and purposefully through the administration. The value, attitude and system of agricultural land held by non-market means, such as relations, when dealing with and allocating the related interests of farmland contract right, The elements of non-market environment include environmental participants and their interrelation and function. The non-market environmental subject of farmland contract right includes individuals, groups and organizations concerned with farmland contract right. According to the participation subject of non-market environment, the current non-market environment of rural farmland contracting right can be divided into government administrative intervention. There are three types of local cultural association and social organization participation. 3 the farmers' perception of farmland contract right can be divided into three categories: the perception of government administrative intervention, the perception of local cultural association and the perception of social organization participation, and the development of the corresponding perception scale. The 伪 -coefficient (0.803) and KMO (0.792) of the scale passed the validity test of the scale, and the factor analysis showed that the measuring model was available. The relationship between the weights of farmers' non-market perception degree and that of government administration intervention (36.79%), local cultural association (32.12%) and social organization participation (31.09%). It shows that the most powerful perception of farmers in the implementation of the contract right is the government administrative intervention. 4 the perception of non-market environment has an important impact on the land circulation, from a single point of view, The path coefficient of the three kinds of non-market environmental perception of endogenous variables on land circulation is 0.820.780.63, which is all positive, so the three kinds of non-market environmental perception can positively promote the land circulation. From a comprehensive point of view, there is a negative relationship between the perception of local cultural association of endogenous variables and the perception of government administrative intervention, and the perception of social organization participation has a negative relationship, and the path coefficient is -0.61- 0.52, respectively. This perception represents the conflict between the non-market environment, and the existence of the conflict indirectly inhibits the land circulation. 5 in view of the impact of the non-market environment perception on the land circulation, The policy suggestions of this paper are as follows: the government should deeply understand the objectivity of the current non-market environment and the conflicts existing in the three kinds of non-market environments. On the basis of understanding the farmers' endogenous culture, the government should reasonably intervene in the implementation process of the right to use agricultural land. In the process of intervention, it can effectively improve the land circulation by strengthening the communication and understanding and the corresponding propaganda efficiency, and strengthening the synergy of different kinds of non-market environment.
【学位授予单位】：甘肃农业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：F321.1
本文编号：2409864
[Abstract]:In the current research process of farmland property right, the market standard is emphasized, but the non-market problem is not paid enough attention to. Accordingly, in order to clarify the existence and influence of non-market environment in the implementation of farmland property right, this paper takes "phenomenon-phenomenon perception-perceived impact" as the research clue, takes the non-market environment of farmland contract right as the research object, synthesizes the subjective and objective. The methodology of combining qualitative and quantitative methods defines the non-market environment of farmland contract right by combing relevant literature and theory. Through questionnaire survey and measurement model, this paper makes an empirical measure of farmers' perception of non-market environment of farmland contract right, and quantifies the influence of farmers' perception of non-market environment on land circulation through structural equation model. The main conclusions are as follows: 1 the non-market environment of farmland contract right is within a certain time and space, the agricultural capital of farmers, governments and non-farmers actively and purposefully through the administration. The value, attitude and system of agricultural land held by non-market means, such as relations, when dealing with and allocating the related interests of farmland contract right, The elements of non-market environment include environmental participants and their interrelation and function. The non-market environmental subject of farmland contract right includes individuals, groups and organizations concerned with farmland contract right. According to the participation subject of non-market environment, the current non-market environment of rural farmland contracting right can be divided into government administrative intervention. There are three types of local cultural association and social organization participation. 3 the farmers' perception of farmland contract right can be divided into three categories: the perception of government administrative intervention, the perception of local cultural association and the perception of social organization participation, and the development of the corresponding perception scale. The 伪 -coefficient (0.803) and KMO (0.792) of the scale passed the validity test of the scale, and the factor analysis showed that the measuring model was available. The relationship between the weights of farmers' non-market perception degree and that of government administration intervention (36.79%), local cultural association (32.12%) and social organization participation (31.09%). It shows that the most powerful perception of farmers in the implementation of the contract right is the government administrative intervention. 4 the perception of non-market environment has an important impact on the land circulation, from a single point of view, The path coefficient of the three kinds of non-market environmental perception of endogenous variables on land circulation is 0.820.780.63, which is all positive, so the three kinds of non-market environmental perception can positively promote the land circulation. From a comprehensive point of view, there is a negative relationship between the perception of local cultural association of endogenous variables and the perception of government administrative intervention, and the perception of social organization participation has a negative relationship, and the path coefficient is -0.61- 0.52, respectively. This perception represents the conflict between the non-market environment, and the existence of the conflict indirectly inhibits the land circulation. 5 in view of the impact of the non-market environment perception on the land circulation, The policy suggestions of this paper are as follows: the government should deeply understand the objectivity of the current non-market environment and the conflicts existing in the three kinds of non-market environments. On the basis of understanding the farmers' endogenous culture, the government should reasonably intervene in the implementation process of the right to use agricultural land. In the process of intervention, it can effectively improve the land circulation by strengthening the communication and understanding and the corresponding propaganda efficiency, and strengthening the synergy of different kinds of non-market environment.
【学位授予单位】：甘肃农业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：F321.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 宋宜农;;新型城镇化背景下我国农村土地流转问题研究[J];经济问题;2017年02期
2 张晓山;;农村基层治理结构:现状、问题与展望[J];求索;2016年07期
3 楼建波;;农户承包经营的农地流转的三权分置——一个功能主义的分析路径[J];南开学报(哲学社会科学版);2016年04期
4 李升发;李秀彬;;耕地撂荒研究进展与展望[J];地理学报;2016年03期
5 黄静;;“三权分置”下农村土地承包经营权流转规范问题研究[J];河南财经政法大学学报;2015年04期
6 高圣平;;新型农业经营体系下农地产权结构的法律逻辑[J];法学研究;2014年04期
7 陈妙香;;农业转移人口市民化视角下的农地产权制度改革[J];金融经济;2014年12期
8 叶必丰;;城镇化中土地征收补偿的平等原则[J];中国法学;2014年03期
9 潘迪;彭纪生;;非市场战略对创新绩效的影响[J];产业经济研究;2013年04期
10 王书明;刘元胜;郭沛;;不同用途农村集体土地征收中的收益分配研究——以辽宁省辽阳市为例[J];农业经济问题;2012年10期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 贺远琼;企业整合市场环境与非市场环境的行为模式研究[D];华中科技大学;2006年
，本文编号：2409864
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/nongyejingjilunwen/2409864.html
