广西苍梧县珠江流域治理再造林项目碳汇供给研究
[Abstract]:Based on the investigation of the main afforestation tree species eucalyptus, Pinus massoniana and Schima superba in the reforestation project of Pearl River Basin management in Cangwu County, the present situation of the management of three tree species in the ten years from 2006 to 2016 was analyzed by means of data collection. The cost-benefit situation was calculated and analyzed separately, and the growth index (DBH, tree height) of 29 sample sites were monitored, the carbon reserves of three tree species stand were calculated, and then the reasonable carbon sink price was obtained by using afforestation cost method, and the forest growth index (DBH, tree height) was measured in 29 sample sites, and then the carbon sequestration price was obtained. Thus, the economic value of carbon sequestration of three tree species stands was estimated and compared. Finally, in order to select the best forest management decision, join the Faustman model, calculate the carbon sink supply of three tree species, analyze the sensitivity of carbon price, labor price, wood price to forest carbon sink supply in terms of carbon price, labor price, wood price and so on. Put forward the relevant countermeasures and suggestions to promote carbon sequestration supply. The conclusions are as follows: (1) there are significant differences in input and output of different tree species. Compared with Pinus massoniana, Eucalyptus and Schima superba, the input in afforestation, rearing and main cutting stage was net, including seedling, labor cost, agricultural cost, transportation (tax) cost, other inputs, and so on. The amount of input was the highest in eucalyptus. Therefore, from the data collection data analysis, three kinds of tree input structure is similar in a single logging period, in terms of input, income and net income, it accords with the law of Eucalyptus Masson pine Schima superba. The main reason for the difference is due to the differences in tree species' own characteristics and wood prices, and the tree species' own characteristics play a decisive role. (2) there is a significant difference in the average carbon reserves of different tree species. In 2016, the average carbon reserves of different tree species are significantly different. The average carbon reserves per hectare of Pinus massoniana stand is 25.61 t, that of eucalyptus forest is 144.54 t, and that of Schima mulch forest is 47.45 t. From 2006 to 2016, the average carbon reserve increased by 2.56 t per year on average. The average carbon reserves of eucalyptus and Schima superba were increased by 14.45 t and 4.75 per year respectively, showing an increasing trend of Pinus massoniana. (3) there were significant differences in the economic value of carbon sequestration among different tree species, in 2016, there were significant differences in the economic value of carbon sequestration among different tree species. The economic value of carbon sequestration per unit area of eucalyptus was the highest, followed by Schima superba and Pinus massoniana. As far as the research project is concerned, the contribution of eucalyptus to the total economic value of carbon sequestration is the largest because of the difference of woodland area, followed by Pinus massoniana, and the contribution of Schima superba is relatively small. (4) there are differences in the expected value of forest land. The difference between expected values of Pinus massoniana, Eucalyptus and Schima superba showed the trend of increasing first and then decreasing. The optimum rotation period of eucalyptus is 10 years, that of Masson pine is 33 years, and that of Schima superba is 36 years. With the change of carbon sequestration price, the optimal rotation period of the three species will be relatively prolonged. (5) the sensitivity of carbon sink supply is different. With the increase of discount rate, the carbon sink supply of Pinus massoniana, Eucalyptus and Schima superba decreased gradually, and the sensitivity of Pinus massoniana to the discount rate was higher than that of Eucalyptus and Schima superba. With the increase of labor price, the carbon sink supply of Pinus massoniana, eucalyptus and Schima superba decreased gradually, and the sensitivity of eucalyptus and Pinus massoniana to labor price was greater than that of Schima superba. With the increase of wood price, the carbon sink supply decreased slightly, and the sensitivity of eucalyptus and Schima superba to wood price was higher than that of Masson pine. (6) suggestions and policy suggestions on promoting forest carbon sink development mainly included: scientific and reasonable development of eucalyptus; Appropriately reduce the scale of pure Pinus massoniana forest; vigorously develop the predominance of local precious tree species. Continue to tap the supply potential of forest carbon sequestration; do a good job in the cultivation of forest carbon sink trading intermediary services, improve the trading mechanism of carbon sequestration, strengthen financial support, pay attention to demonstration promotion; Strengthen the publicity, strengthen the training of forest technology, improve the understanding of forest carbon sinks from all walks of life.
【学位授予单位】:广西大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F326.27;S718.5
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 林秀群;葛颖;;中国西南地区农田生态系统碳源/汇时空差异研究[J];江苏农业学报;2016年05期
2 魏兴;赵吉;清华;曾静;;库布齐沙漠灌木碳汇的计量方法研究——以柠条和沙柳为例[J];赤峰学院学报(自然科学版);2016年18期
3 黄宰胜;陈钦;;基于造林成本法的林业碳汇成本收益影响因素分析[J];资源科学;2016年03期
4 程彩芳;李正才;周君刚;吴亚丛;赵志霞;孙娇娇;;不同林龄木荷-青冈栎混交林幼林土壤活性有机碳库研究[J];西北植物学报;2015年09期
5 刘发林;曾思齐;吕勇;刘勉声;肖化顺;彭其龙;刘玉;;木荷次生林经营密度调控技术的研究[J];中南林业科技大学学报;2013年11期
6 邹淑琴;;马尾松木荷混交造林经营效果研究[J];绿色科技;2013年10期
7 王楚彪;刘丽婷;莫晓勇;;30个桉树无性系人工林碳储量分析[J];林业科学研究;2013年05期
8 冷清波;周早弘;;东江源区森林系统碳汇计量[J];西北林学院学报;2013年05期
9 王枫;沈月琴;朱臻;林建华;王小玲;;杉木碳汇的经济学分析:基于浙江省的调查[J];浙江农林大学学报;2012年05期
10 侯学会;牛铮;黄妮;高帅;;广东省桉树碳储量和碳汇价值估算[J];东北林业大学学报;2012年08期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 李建华;碳汇林的交易机制、监测及成本价格研究[D];南京林业大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 汪晶;杉木人工林多功能经营决策支持系统的研究[D];北京林业大学;2016年
2 王鹏;我国山区森林碳汇项目的发展现状与对策研究[D];中国海洋大学;2015年
3 吴作省;马尾松碳汇效率评价研究[D];福建农林大学;2015年
4 曾程;基于碳汇补贴的碳税的森林碳汇政策对林业经济的影响研究—可计算一般均衡模型(CGE)[D];浙江农林大学;2014年
5 王小玲;杉木、马尾松成本收益及其碳汇供给研究[D];浙江农林大学;2013年
6 王锐浩;森林碳汇交易的价格成因分析及价格确定策略研究[D];东北林业大学;2012年
7 周燕;发展我国森林碳汇的公共政策研究[D];湖南大学;2011年
8 魏亚韬;我国造林再造林碳汇项目碳计量方法研究[D];北京林业大学;2011年
9 夏鑫;马尾松人工林的老龄林生态系统生物量和碳贮量研究[D];福建农林大学;2008年
10 杨智杰;杉木、木荷人工林碳吸存与碳平衡研究[D];福建农林大学;2007年
,本文编号:2464192
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/nongyejingjilunwen/2464192.html