中国—东盟自贸区争端解决的机制研究

发布时间：2018-01-01 16:25

本文关键词：中国—东盟自贸区争端解决的机制研究　出处：《暨南大学》2015年博士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着经济全球化与区域经济一体化的发展,中国-东盟自贸区(CAFTA)这一完全由发展中国家组成的经济自由贸易区应潮流诞生,而当前的CAFTA区域经济正快速发展,贸易纠纷和冲突处于高发时期。不可忽视的问题是,CAFTA争端解决的法律机制应如何有效保障CAFTA运行,从而使中国和东盟国家之间一旦发生争端,就能得以妥善、快速地解决。本文从CAFTA争端解决机制的内容及出台背景入手,通过文献研究法、比较研究法、案例分析法、跨学科论证法等研究方法多角度进行综合分析,具有创新性地从宏观的国际关系理论视角出发,结合博弈论予以研究,阐明法律依据和争端解决的博弈理论,与WTO、各区域争端解决机制比较的同时,进一步比较分析CAFTA各种争端解决的途径,得出CAFTA争端解决机制本身特有的价值,再结合理论引入实际案例进行专题探讨,最后提出完善建议和进行对策研究。为应对CAFTA矛盾纠纷多元化的发展趋势,需加快构建多元化的争端解决机制,整合社会资源,综合运用外交、和解、调解、仲裁、司法等多种方式和手段,形成功能互补、程序衔接的争端有效化解体系,为CAFTA争端当事人提供符合他们利益偏好的、可供选择的解决途径,构建CAFTA争端解决的机制,形成体系,从而及时有效地化解矛盾与争端,维持CAFTA良性发展。
[Abstract]:With the development of economic globalization and regional economic integration, China-ASEAN Free Trade area (CAFTAA), an economic free trade area composed entirely of developing countries, should be born. The current CAFTA regional economy is developing rapidly, trade disputes and conflicts are in a period of high incidence. How should the legal mechanism of CAFTA dispute settlement effectively guarantee the operation of CAFTA, so that once there is a dispute between China and ASEAN countries, it can be appropriate. This paper starts with the content and background of CAFTA dispute settlement mechanism, through literature research method, comparative research method, case analysis method. The interdisciplinary argumentation method and other research methods are comprehensively analyzed from various angles. From the perspective of macroscopic international relations theory and game theory, the author clarifies the legal basis and the game theory of dispute settlement. Compared with each regional dispute settlement mechanism, this paper further compares and analyzes the various methods of CAFTA dispute settlement, and concludes the unique value of CAFTA dispute settlement mechanism. Combined with the theory of the introduction of practical cases for special discussion, and finally put forward suggestions and countermeasures to deal with the CAFTA contradictions and disputes of the development trend of diversification. It is necessary to accelerate the construction of a diversified dispute settlement mechanism, integrate social resources, and make comprehensive use of diplomacy, reconciliation, mediation, arbitration, justice and other ways and means to form a complementary function. Procedural convergence of the dispute resolution system, for the CAFTA dispute parties to provide the interests of their preferences, alternative approaches to the settlement of the CAFTA dispute settlement mechanism, forming a system. In order to resolve conflicts and disputes in time and effectively, to maintain the benign development of CAFTA.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D996.1

【参考文献】