新重商主义理论研究和实践分析

发布时间：2018-01-09 06:07

本文关键词：新重商主义理论研究和实践分析　出处：《山东大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：新重商主义是重商主义的思想在新的时代的崭新体现,早期用来解释美国的一系列贸易保护的经济学新思想。随着世界各国贸易活动程度的加深与范围的拓广,对新重商主义的研究也更加深入。经过长期的研究经济学家们发现新重商主义早在美国贸易保护政策之前已经产生并可以有效的解决凯恩斯主义滞涨遗留的一系列目前无法解决的经济问题,经济学家已对新重商主义的当前地位给予了肯定,认为新重商主义是解决当前世界经济难题的方法之一。新重商主义主要思想继续古老的重商主义的基本理念:国家宏观调控发展贸易、通过贸易顺差获得资本积累。这无疑是非常适应当前全球化的程度日益增高的全球市场。近年来无论是强国还是弱国都对新重商主义非常重视,但是基于各种原因各国的实施程度大相径庭,例如相对完整的日本新重商主义,实施部分新重商主义外贸政策的美国,但是都对于解决当前问题效果显著。因此新重商主义一度被认为是一种比新凯恩斯主义与新自由主义更适应当前世界格局的经济学主义。但是伴随着区域经济一体化的发展壮大,直至世界上第一个完整强大的区域一体化集团----欧盟的成立,各国发现区域一体化比新重商主义更为快速有效的解决经济问题,它所推崇的区域内完全自由思想也被自由主义学者认为是自由主义与初步全球化的完美体现。不过随着欧盟的进一步发展,内部的自由化程度更深,欧盟对于外界的贸易问题也逐步体现出来,各种形式的贸易壁垒开始建立在欧盟与世界各国之间,欧盟与各国的贸易也从自由逐步转变为积累资本、追求贸易顺差的趋势,这和新重商主义的基本理念类似。为探究区域一体化的转变究竟是不是只是新重商主义的一种新的实践方式,本文将对比较典型的新重商主义国家日本进行分析,总结新重商主义的本质与具体政策体现,再进一步的对美国与欧盟进行案例比较与分析,结合Combessaadi-sedik和Leamer的计量方法,再对美国与欧盟的贸易政策进行定量分析,验证欧盟确实采用了新重商主义的贸易政策,并比美国的新重商主义贸易系数更高,以此证明欧盟的区域一体化是一种新重商主义实践的新方式。
[Abstract]:Neo-mercantilism is a new embodiment of mercantilism in the new era. It is used to explain a series of new economic ideas of trade protection in the United States in the early stage. With the deepening of the degree of trade activities and the expansion of the scope of various countries in the world. After a long period of research economists have found that neo-mercantilism has emerged long before the United States trade protection policy and can effectively solve the legacy of Keynesian stagflation. List current economic problems that cannot be solved. Economists have affirmed the current status of neo-mercantilism. It is considered that neo-mercantilism is one of the ways to solve the problems in the world economy. The main idea of neo-mercantilism is to continue the basic idea of ancient mercantilism: state macro-control to develop trade. Capital accumulation through the trade surplus is undoubtedly a global market that is well adapted to the increasing degree of globalization. In recent years, both powerful and weak countries have attached great importance to neo-mercantilism. However, the degree of implementation varies greatly for various reasons, such as the relatively complete Japanese neo-mercantilism and the United States, which implements part of the neo-mercantilist foreign trade policy. Therefore, neo-mercantilism was once considered to be a kind of economicism which is more suitable to the current world pattern than neo-Keynesianism and neoliberalism. But it is accompanied by a regional economy. The development of the body. Until the establishment of the European Union, the world's first integrated and powerful regional integration group, countries found that regional integration was more efficient than neo-mercantilism in solving economic problems. The idea of complete freedom in the region is also regarded by liberalism scholars as the perfect embodiment of liberalism and preliminary globalization, but with the further development of the European Union, the degree of internal liberalization is deeper. European Union for the external trade problems are gradually reflected, various forms of trade barriers began to be established between the European Union and the rest of the world, trade between the European Union and other countries has gradually changed from freedom to capital accumulation. The trend of pursuing trade surplus is similar to the basic idea of neo-mercantilism. In order to find out whether the transformation of regional integration is just a new practical way of neo-mercantilism. This paper will analyze the typical neo-mercantilism country Japan, sum up the essence and concrete policy embodiment of neo-mercantilism, and further compare and analyze the case between the United States and the European Union. Combined with the measurement methods of Combessaadi-sedik and Leamer, the quantitative analysis of the trade policy between the United States and the European Union is carried out. It is proved that the European Union's regional integration is a new way of new mercantilism practice by verifying that the European Union has adopted the new mercantilist trade policy and has a higher trade coefficient than the American new mercantilism.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：F091.31

【相似文献】