广西中越边境喀斯特地区自然生态旅游景观价值提升研究
发布时间:2018-03-29 18:23
本文选题:广西中越边境 切入点:喀斯特地区 出处:《广西师范学院》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:广西中越边境地区独特的喀斯特地貌造就了丰富多样的喀斯特自然景观,其景观质量甚至不亚于桂林山水。近年来,广西中越边境地区以“中越神秘边关”为旅游品牌,吸引了不少游客前来探秘,但从总体上看,旅游业发展仍然较为缓慢,未能充分发挥该地区的资源优势。因此,提升喀斯特自然生态旅游景观价值,充分发挥资源优势,对于推动该地区的生态旅游发展具有重要的意义。 通过实地考察和资料收集,文章提炼出研究区五种主要的典型自然生态旅游景观类型,分别为森林植被景观、峰丛地貌景观、河流水体景观、岩溶洞穴景观和峡谷景观。构建了广西中越边境喀斯特地区自然生态旅游景观价值评价体系,运用层次分析法确定评价指标权重,建立了景观价值评价模型。运用评分标准和评价体系对研究区内的德天瀑布、龙宫仙境、通灵大峡谷等三个典型喀斯特自然生态旅游景观区进行景观价值综合评价。并依据研究区景观特点及评价结果分别对这五种典型景观类型提出景观价值提升措施。研究结果表明: (1)在评价指标体系的准则层中,,美学价值最为重要,其他依次为生态价值、科学文化价值和开发价值,其对总目标的权重值分别为0.4351、0.3092、0.1501、0.1056;评价指标层中的优美度、自然度、典型度、奇特度、丰富度、组合度、生态稳定性、生态环境容量、植被覆盖率、空气清新度、科学研究价值、科普教育价值、历史文化价值、区位条件、区域经济基础、可进入性、服务设施、运营管理等18个指标,其对总目标的权重分别为0.0637、0.0562、0.0790、0.1531、0.0466、0.0366、0.1308、0.0379、0.0702、0.0792、0.0212、0.0787、0.0501、0.0387、0.0080、0.0201、0.0188、0.0201。 (2)三个典型景观区的美学价值均相对较高,其次为生态价值,但分数并非特别理想,科学文化价值和开发价值分数较低,尤其是开发价值。可见在该区未来的发展中,自然生态旅游景观的四种价值均有待提升,特别是开发价值应当受到政府主管部门的重视。 (3)研究区自然生态旅游景观可从美学价值、生态价值、科学文化价值、开发价值等为出发点,依据各类景观特点,通过改造林相、挖掘特殊景观、匹配景观要素、优化观景视角、优化观赏路线、完善讲解系统、提炼地质科普、挖掘文化内涵、提升可进入性、提升服务设施、提升管理运营等多种措施全方位提升景观价值。
[Abstract]:The unique karst landforms in Guangxi's Sino-Vietnamese border area have created rich and diverse karst natural landscapes, and their landscape quality is no less than that of Guilin's. In recent years, Guangxi's Sino-Vietnamese border areas have taken the "Sino-Vietnamese mysterious border crossing" as a tourist brand. Many tourists have been attracted to visit the secret, but on the whole, the development of tourism is still relatively slow, and the resources advantage of this area has not been brought into full play. Therefore, to promote the value of karst natural ecotourism landscape and give full play to the resource advantage, It is of great significance to promote the development of ecotourism in this area. Through on-the-spot investigation and data collection, five main types of typical natural ecotourism landscape in the study area were abstracted, namely forest vegetation landscape, peak cluster landscape, river water landscape, etc. Karst cave landscape and canyon landscape. The evaluation system of natural ecotourism landscape value in karst area of Sino-Vietnam border in Guangxi is constructed, and the weight of evaluation index is determined by AHP. The evaluation model of landscape value is established. The evaluation system is used to evaluate the Detian Falls, Longgong Wonderland in the study area. Comprehensive evaluation of landscape value of three typical karst ecotourism areas including Tongling Grand Canyon is carried out. Based on the landscape characteristics and evaluation results of the study area, the measures to enhance the landscape value of these five typical landscape types are put forward respectively. ... the results of the study indicate that:. In the criterion layer of evaluation index system, aesthetic value is the most important, and the others are ecological value, scientific and cultural value and development value, the weight of which to the total target is 0.4351 / 0.3092 / 0.1501/ 0.1056 respectively; the degree of beauty, naturalness and typicality in the evaluation index layer, Strangeness, richness, combination, ecological stability, ecological environmental capacity, vegetation coverage, air freshness, scientific research value, popular science education value, historical and cultural value, location conditions, regional economic base, accessibility, The weight to the total target of 18 indexes, such as service facilities, operation management and so on, is 0.0637 / 0.0562/ 0.0790 / 0.1531/ 0.0466/ 0.1306 / 0.1308 / 0 / 0.03799 / 0.0702 / 0.0792 / 0.02120.0787/ 0.0501/ 0.03870.00800.02010.01880.0201. (2) the aesthetic value of the three typical landscape areas is relatively high, followed by ecological value, but the score is not particularly ideal, the value of science and culture and the value of development are low, especially the value of development. The four kinds of value of natural ecotourism landscape need to be improved, especially the value of development should be paid attention to by the government. 3) the natural ecotourism landscape in the research area can be regarded as the starting point of aesthetic value, ecological value, scientific and cultural value, development value and so on. According to the characteristics of all kinds of landscape, the special landscape can be excavated and the landscape elements can be matched. Optimizing the view angle, optimizing the viewing route, perfecting the explanation system, refining the geological science popularization, excavating the cultural connotation, enhancing the investibility, enhancing the service facilities, enhancing the management and operation, and so on, all kinds of measures to enhance the landscape value in all directions.
【学位授予单位】:广西师范学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:F592.7
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李晖;王月;王艳分;;桂林会仙喀斯特湿地生态环境调查及生态旅游开发[J];安徽农业科学;2010年27期
2 肖笃宁;解伏菊;魏建兵;;景观价值与景观保护评价[J];地理科学;2006年04期
3 保继刚;喀斯特洞穴旅游开发[J];地理学报;1995年04期
4 程道品;刘宏盈;叶晔;;桂林喀斯特景观开发建议与对策研究[J];东南亚纵横;2006年02期
5 庄志民;旅游美学的基本内涵及其理论框架[J];桂林旅游高等专科学校学报;1999年S2期
6 刘宏盈;程道品;叶晔;;桂林喀斯特景观分类与评价研究[J];广西师范学院学报(自然科学版);2006年S1期
7 李兴中;兴义马岭河喀斯特景观及旅游开发探讨[J];贵州地质;1999年02期
8 李兴中;贵州高原喀斯特景观及其旅游形象[J];贵州地质;2002年02期
9 李杰义;陈端吕;;张家界旅游景观的系统评价及其调控优化[J];经济地理;2012年04期
10 方海川;景观及旅游景观特征探讨[J];乐山师范学院学报;2002年03期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 龚克;桂林喀斯特区生态旅游资源评价与开发战略管理研究[D];中国地质大学(北京);2012年
本文编号:1682297
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/quyujingjilunwen/1682297.html