产业结构、金融发展与中国地区经济增长差异

发布时间：2018-04-16 13:30

本文选题：产业结构 + 金融发展　；参考：《华东师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：改革开放后的近四十年里,中国经济高速增长,经济总量已稳居全球第二。但经济增速下滑,产业结构进化缓慢,金融发展水平与产业结构升级的匹配效应低等问题日益突出。中国经济增长的神话在一定程度上呈现减弱趋势,并宣告从此进入了"新常态"的时代。与此同时,我国区域间经济发展水平差距也逐渐拉大,产业结构与金融发展水平不均衡现象也愈演愈烈。如何调整产业结构,创造适宜经济结构发展的金融环境,缩小区域间经济发展差距,对我国未来能否成功实现经济转型具有重大战略意义。因此,本文从产业结构、金融发展、经济增长这三大核心点出发,首先总结了前人的研究成果,系统地梳理了产业结构与金融发展、产业结构与经济增长以及金融发展与经济增长间相互关系的理论,并在此基础上总结了产业结构与金融发展共同对经济增长影响的内在机制;其次,考察了历年来我国经济增长情况、产业结构变迁与金融发展深化的历程,并分区域地归纳了发展现状与特征,加深了对区域经济结构变迁的认识。再次,通过使用2003-2014年的我国31个省级面板数据,构建了我国产业结构、金融发展与经济增长的一般经济模型,并分东、中、西部三个地区,对比考察了地区经济增长的内在机制,解释了形成这种差异化的内在原因。最后根据实证结论得出了相应的政策建议。本文的研究结论如下:(1)目前我国产业结构对经济增长促进效应较大的为资本密集型产业,技术密集型产业的推动作用仍有待提高。(2)我国金融发展水平对经济增长起到推动作用,并且其作用要弱于产业结构对经济增长的影响。(3)我国产业结构与金融发展水平之间形成了有效的共同促进机制,但是共同推动效果较弱,仍有较大的进步空间。(4)相较于我国东部地区,中西部地区的金融发展水平对经济增长的作用渠道并不畅通,仍需进一步加强地区金融发展水平,完善金融体系与市场机制的共同作用体系。(5)我国经济增长、产业结构、金融发展水平之间还未形成一个高效的、完整的内在运作机制。
[Abstract]:In the past 40 years since the reform and opening up, China's economy has grown at a high speed and its total economic output has steadily ranked second in the world.However, the economic growth rate is declining, the industrial structure evolves slowly, and the matching effect between the financial development level and the industrial structure upgrading is low.To some extent, the myth of China's economic growth shows a weakening trend and declares that it has entered the era of "new normal".At the same time, the gap between regional economic development level and the imbalance between industrial structure and financial development level is gradually widening.How to adjust the industrial structure, create a suitable financial environment for the development of economic structure, and narrow the gap between regional economic development is of great strategic significance for the successful economic transformation of our country in the future.Therefore, starting from the three core points of industrial structure, financial development and economic growth, this paper first summarizes the previous research results and systematically combs the industrial structure and financial development.Based on the theory of the relationship between industrial structure and economic growth and between financial development and economic growth, the paper summarizes the internal mechanism of the influence of industrial structure and financial development on economic growth.This paper examines the history of economic growth, industrial structure change and financial development in China over the years, and summarizes the present situation and characteristics of development in different regions, thus deepening the understanding of the changes of regional economic structure.Thirdly, by using the 31 provincial panel data from 2003 to 2014, the general economic model of China's industrial structure, financial development and economic growth is constructed, which is divided into three regions: east, middle and west.The internal mechanism of regional economic growth is compared and the internal reasons for the differentiation are explained.Finally, according to the empirical conclusions of the corresponding policy recommendations.The research conclusions of this paper are as follows: (1) at present, the promotion effect of industrial structure on economic growth in China is greater than that of capital-intensive industries, while that of technology-intensive industries still needs to be improved.) the level of financial development in China plays a role in promoting economic growth.And its function is weaker than the influence of industrial structure on economic growth.Compared with the eastern region of China, the financial development level in the central and western regions does not have an unimpeded role in economic growth, and the level of regional financial development still needs to be further strengthened.Perfecting the common action system of financial system and market mechanism. (5) China's economic growth, industrial structure and financial development level have not yet formed an efficient and complete internal operating mechanism.
【学位授予单位】：华东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：F832.7;F127

【参考文献】