当前位置:主页 > 经济论文 > 世界经济论文 >

海峡西岸经济区生态效率实证研究

发布时间:2018-01-03 14:26

  本文关键词:海峡西岸经济区生态效率实证研究 出处:《华侨大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


  更多相关文章: 生态效率 三阶段DEA模型 SFA模型 σ趋同


【摘要】:近年来,世界范围内环境污染、资源消耗与经济发展之间的矛盾不断激化,为此我国政府在“十二五”发展规划中,提出了要建立绿色海西经济区的战略目标。围绕这一目标,海西经济区在构建六大可持续的生态支撑方面,取得了重大成果。但总体的环境形势仍然不容乐观,生态环境仍然比较脆弱,个别区域的环境质量有所下降。因此,,测评生态效率的水平,研究生态效率的制约因素,寻求提高海西经济区生态效率的途径,就具有十分重要的理论和实践意义。 首先本文在综合国内外研究文献的基础上,结合海峡西岸经济区发展的实际情况,对生态效率的概念进行了界定,使其区别于传统的环境效率评价和能源利用效率。 其次,在对比了三种生态效率的测评方法后,根据其优劣选择了非参数的DEA模型来进行测度。但这种方法目前使用的最大缺点就是随机误差和环境因素会对其效率值产生影响。为此,本文以海西经济区20个设区市为研究对象,采用三阶段DEA方法对2003-2011年海峡西岸经济区的生态效率进行评估。实证结果表明,随机误差因素与外部环境因素确实对海西的生态效率值产生了显著的影响,调整后的海西经济区生态技术效率值、规模效率值及纯技术效率值都出现了不同程度的下降。同时研究发现,作为外部环境变量的人均受教育年限和第三产业占经济总量的比例都对海西经济区生态效率的增长有着正向的促进作用,而政府的环保财政支出并未发挥其应有的效用。 进一步地,根据对调整后的效率值以及σ趋同分析可知,海西经济区三大区域的生态环境状况分布极不均衡,各个区域之间、区域内部的各个设区市之间的三大效率值差异显著。其中,西部差异最大,中部次之,东部最小,且三大区域之间收敛趋势明显,存在着一定的“追赶”现象。 最后,根据实证的研究结果,总结了海西经济区生态环境建设中存在的问题,并针对性地提出了若干建议。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the contradiction between environmental pollution, resource consumption and economic development in the world has been intensified. Therefore, our government is in the 12th Five-Year Plan. This paper puts forward the strategic goal of establishing the green Hercynian economic zone. Around this goal, the Hercynian economic zone has made great achievements in the construction of six sustainable ecological support, but the overall environmental situation is still not optimistic. The ecological environment is still relatively fragile, and the environmental quality of individual regions has declined. Therefore, to evaluate the level of ecological efficiency, study the constraints of ecological efficiency, and seek ways to improve the ecological efficiency of the Hercynian Economic Zone. It has very important theoretical and practical significance. Firstly, this paper defines the concept of ecological efficiency on the basis of synthesizing domestic and foreign research literature, combined with the actual situation of the development of the economic zone in the West Bank of the Straits. It distinguishes it from traditional environmental efficiency evaluation and energy use efficiency. Secondly, after comparing the three methods of ecological efficiency evaluation. According to its merits and demerits, the non-parametric DEA model is chosen to measure. However, the biggest disadvantage of this method is that random error and environmental factors will affect its efficiency value. This paper takes 20 cities in the Hercynian Economic Zone as the research object and evaluates the ecological efficiency of the economic zone in the West Bank of the Straits from 2003 to 2011 by using the three-stage DEA method. Random error factors and external environmental factors do have a significant impact on the ecological efficiency of Hercynian, and the adjusted eco-technical efficiency of the Hercynian Economic Zone. Both the scale efficiency and the pure technical efficiency have decreased in different degrees. At the same time, the study found that. As an external environmental variable, the age of per capita education and the proportion of tertiary industry to the total economic volume have a positive effect on the growth of ecological efficiency in the Hercynian economic zone. And the government's environmental financial expenditure did not play its due role. Further, according to the adjusted efficiency and 蟽 convergence analysis, the three regions of the Hercynian Economic Zone ecological environment distribution is extremely uneven, between the regions. There are significant differences in the three efficiency values among the cities within the region. Among them, the western region is the largest, the central region is the second, and the eastern region is the smallest, and the convergence trend between the three regions is obvious. There is a certain "chase" phenomenon. Finally, according to the empirical research results, this paper summarizes the existing problems in the construction of ecological environment in the Hercynian economic zone, and puts forward some suggestions.
【学位授予单位】:华侨大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:F127;F224

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 魏婷;吴长年;;一种工业园区生态系统健康评价方法及其应用[J];长江流域资源与环境;2007年05期

2 马育军;黄贤金;肖思思;王舒;;基于DEA模型的区域生态环境建设绩效评价——以江苏省苏州市为例[J];长江流域资源与环境;2007年06期

3 戴铁军;陆钟武;;钢铁企业生态效率分析[J];东北大学学报;2005年12期

4 诸大建,朱远;生态效率与循环经济[J];复旦学报(社会科学版);2005年02期

5 邱寿丰;;中国区域经济发展的生态效率研究[J];能源与环境;2008年04期

6 武春友;孙源远;;基于生态承载力的工业园区生态效率评价研究[J];管理学报;2009年06期

7 毛建素;曾润;杜艳春;姜畔;;中国工业行业的生态效率[J];环境科学;2010年11期

8 杨斌;;2000—2006年中国区域生态效率研究——基于DEA方法的实证分析[J];经济地理;2009年07期

9 张军,吴桂英,张吉鹏;中国省际物质资本存量估算:1952—2000[J];经济研究;2004年10期

10 刘丙泉;李雷鸣;宋杰鲲;;中国区域生态效率测度与差异性分析[J];技术经济与管理研究;2011年10期



本文编号:1374282

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/shijiejingjilunwen/1374282.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户c4efd***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com