中国产业政策的两种模式与转换取向

发布时间：2018-02-24 16:15

本文关键词： 赶超型产业政策成熟型产业政策供给侧改革宏观经济调控　出处：《江汉论坛》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：纵观产业政策争议的历程,本质上产业政策分析的终极逻辑在于产业发展过程中如何塑造政府和市场的协同机制,"由选择性产业政策向功能性产业政策转换"是众多研究产业政策学者的普遍看法,但从产业演进的动态视角来看,这种理论指向并不符合产业演进阶段的发展诉求。"宏观政策要稳、产业政策要准"在当前产业政策转换的关键阶段既有继承又有批判创新意蕴,其最终目标仍在于契合产业政策转换阶段的基本特征,努力构建政策信号与市场信号在不同领域发挥协同作用的模式。相较原有的选择性产业政策和功能性产业政策要旨,现阶段构建新的产业政策取向主要集中在两个方面:一是强化政策引导、市场调节的方式,加快过剩产能的退出力度,规避"泛市场化"风险;二是
[Abstract]:Throughout the history of industrial policy disputes, In essence, the ultimate logic of industrial policy analysis lies in how to shape the synergistic mechanism between government and market in the process of industrial development. "the transformation from selective industrial policy to functional industrial policy" is the general view of many industrial policy scholars. However, from the dynamic angle of view of industrial evolution, this theory does not meet the demand of development in the stage of industrial evolution. "Macro-policy should be stable, industrial policy should be accurate" in the key stage of current industrial policy transformation, there is both inheritance and critical innovation implication in the key stage of industrial policy transformation. Its ultimate goal is still to accord with the basic characteristics of the industrial policy transformation stage, and to construct the mode of policy signal and market signal synergism in different fields, comparing with the original selective industrial policy and functional industrial policy gist. At the present stage, the construction of new industrial policies mainly focuses on two aspects: first, to strengthen the policy guidance, the way of market regulation, to accelerate the withdrawal of overcapacity, and to avoid the risk of "pan-marketization";
【作者单位】：深圳大学中国经济特区研究中心;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“经济特区产业转型与发展机会的社会分配研究”(项目编号:15JJDZONGHE032) 国家社会科学基金重点项目“海上丝绸之路战略下东南沿海湾区经济发展研究”(项目编号:15BJL113) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“转型期我国产业政策的调整取向研究”(项目编号:000022070130) “广东省技术创新效率地区差异的制度成因研究”(项目编号:000022070129)
【分类号】：F120

【相似文献】