法律化、制度竞争与亚太经济一体化的路径选择

发布时间：2018-03-16 00:09

  本文选题：法律化　切入点：国际制度竞争　出处：《东南亚研究》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：作为推动亚太经济一体化的重要力量,中国和美国都着力在亚太地区打造自贸区网络,试图整合亚太经贸规则。由于两国自贸区策略在义务性、精确性和授权性等法律化水平上存在显著差别,客观上形成了亚太经济一体化的两种路径,其背后是美国和中国围绕贸易规则的国际制度竞争。对不同路径的选择与中国和美国在国际贸易制度中的比较优势密切相关。作为在位者,美国倾向于通过较高法律化水平的方式巩固自身的规则收益和治理话语权。作为进入者,中国则主要通过较低的法律化水平降低缔约过程的交易成本来获得伙伴收益。
[Abstract]:As an important force in promoting economic integration in the Asia-Pacific region, both China and the United States are making efforts to build a free trade zone network in the Asia-Pacific region to try to integrate the Asia-Pacific economic and trade rules. There are significant differences in the level of legalization, such as accuracy and authoritarianism, which objectively form two paths of Asia-Pacific economic integration. The choice of different paths is closely related to the comparative advantage of China and China in the international trade system. The United States tends to consolidate its rules and governance rights through a higher level of legalization, while China, as an entrant, obtains the benefits of its partners mainly by lowering the transaction costs of the contracting process at a lower level of legalization.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学国际关系学院;中国—东盟区域发展协同创新中心;
【基金】：中国—东盟区域发展协同创新中心科研专项和教育部长江学者和创新团队发展计划联合资助(CW201516)
【分类号】：D996.1;F114.46
，

本文编号：1617440