湖北

发布时间：2018-04-08 13:34

本文选题：四化同步　切入点：空间差异　出处：《湖北农业科学》2016年22期

【摘要】：以县域为研究单元,构建"四化同步"发展评价模型以揭示湖北省各县市"四化"水平的发展状况,采用地理—经济空间权重,运用ESDA方法,分析其发展的空间差异。结果表明,2003年以来,湖北省各县市"四化同步"发展水平不一致,中心城市及平原地区水平较高,鄂东及鄂西山区水平较低,边缘化现象突出,且呈现出重点发展区农产品主产区生态功能区的特点;其发展水平在全局上有较强的空间自相关性,且形成以武汉和宜昌双中心带动的格局,其发展空间差异性与社会经济发展现状相符,也与湖北省城镇发展战略一致。根据这些差异,结合湖北省主体功能区划和城镇发展战略,可有针对性地制定全面推进型、统筹发展型、生态优先型三种不同的"四化同步"发展路径。
[Abstract]:Taking the county area as the research unit, this paper constructs the evaluation model of the development of "four modernizations" in order to reveal the development situation of the "four modernizations" in various counties and cities of Hubei Province. The geographical and economic spatial weights and the ESDA method are used to analyze the spatial differences of their development.The results show that since 2003, the development level of "four modernizations synchronously" has not been consistent, the level of central city and plain area is higher, the level of mountain area of east Hubei and western Hubei is lower, and the phenomenon of marginalization is prominent.It also shows the characteristics of the ecological function area of the main agricultural products producing area in the key development area, and its development level has a strong spatial autocorrelation in the overall situation, and forms a pattern driven by the dual centers of Wuhan and Yichang.The spatial difference of development is consistent with the present situation of social and economic development and the strategy of urban development in Hubei Province.According to these differences, combined with the main function division of Hubei Province and the development strategy of cities and towns, three different development paths of "four modernizations" can be formulated in a comprehensive way, as a whole, as a whole, as a whole, and as an ecological priority.
【作者单位】：中国地质大学公共管理学院;
【分类号】：F127

【相似文献】