绝对收入、相对收入与伊斯特林悖论:基于CGSS的实证研究

发布时间：2018-04-21 13:56

本文选题：收入 + 相对收入　；参考：《南开经济研究》2017年04期

【摘要】：利用CGSS数据,本文检验了中国收入与幸福感之间的关系。在考察了四种相对收入度量指标的特点之后,本文首选相对收入指标,并发现绝对收入和相对收入均对幸福感有显著正向影响;但对于低收入者而言,绝对收入对幸福感有显著的正向影响而相对收入无显著影响;对于高收入者而言,相对收入对幸福感有显著的正向影响而绝对收入无显著影响。究其原因,低收入者绝对收入的增加能改善其对家庭关系、人际关系和自身健康状况等方面的满意度,而高收入者则不能如此,但高收入者能通过相对收入的提高来改善其对自身居住社区的满意度。因此,在制定收入分配政策时,对于低收入者,我们需要提高其绝对收入水平;对于高收入者,我们在调节其收入时需要关注其相对收入水平的变化。
[Abstract]:Using CGSS data, this paper examines the relationship between income and well-being in China. After examining the characteristics of four relative income measures, this paper chooses the relative income index as the first choice, and finds that both absolute income and relative income have significant positive effects on happiness, but for low-income people, Absolute income has a significant positive effect on well-being but no significant effect on relative income; for high income, relative income has a significant positive effect on well-being, but absolute income has no significant effect. The reason is that an increase in the absolute income of low-income people can improve their satisfaction with family relationships, interpersonal relationships and their own health, while those with high incomes do not. But high-income earners can improve their satisfaction with their communities by increasing their relative income. Therefore, in formulating income distribution policies, we need to raise the absolute income level for the low-income group, and for the high-income group, we need to pay attention to the change of their relative income level in adjusting their income.
【作者单位】：对外经济贸易大学保险经济学院;对外经济贸易大学国际经济贸易学院;
【基金】：对外经济贸易大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(14YB02) 国家社会科学基金项目(15BJY134)资助第48批教育部“留学回国人员科研启动基金”项目(中国税负归宿实证分析)支持
【分类号】：F124.7

【相似文献】