英国脱欧的政治经济学逻辑——基于国际公共品供给的双层博弈分析

发布时间：2018-05-16 22:16

本文选题：英国脱欧 + 国际公共品供给　；参考：《国际观察》2017年05期

【摘要】：欧盟及在其基础上形成的欧洲一体化收益具有国际公共品的性质。而国际公共品的供给是多个民族国家集体决策与单个国家内部利益集团交织作用的结果,是国内国际双重博弈的产物。随着"逆全球化"的兴起,这种双重博弈现象愈发明显。为此,本文首先构建了一个对国际公共品供给中双层博弈进行分析的理论框架,然后以此为基础,剖析英国脱欧背后蕴含的政治经济学逻辑。研究结果表明,欧盟及在其基础上形成的一体化收益的分配是不均匀的,即表现出明显的非中性特征,以致在英国国内选民中形成了两大利益集团——从一体化收益中获益较多的精英集团及获益较少、甚至为负的中低收入集团,各利益集团彼此博弈,以谋求自身利益的最大化。而在国际层面,英国从欧洲一体化中所获收益与成本付出的不相匹配,导致其与欧盟之间讨价还价,以提升英国的国家利益。在公投所体现的直接民主制度下,中低收入集团的利益最终决定了国家利益,于是脱离欧盟即不继续参与欧盟这一国际公共品的供给遂成为英国的最终选择。
[Abstract]:The European Union and the benefits of European integration on its basis have the nature of international public goods. The supply of international public goods is the result of the interweaving of the collective decision of the multi-nation countries and the internal interest groups of a single country, and the result of the double game between the domestic and the international. With the rise of anti-globalization, this double-game phenomenon becomes more and more obvious. Therefore, this paper first constructs a theoretical framework to analyze the two-level game in the supply of international public goods, and then, on the basis of this, analyzes the political economic logic behind Brexit. The results show that the distribution of the EU and the integration benefits formed on its basis is uneven, that is, it shows obvious non-neutral characteristics. As a result, two interest groups have formed in the British domestic electors-the elite group which has more benefit from the integration income and the low and middle income group, even the negative low and middle income group. The interest groups play games with each other in order to maximize their own interests. At the international level, Britain's gains from European integration and the cost of the mismatch, resulting in a bargain with the European Union, in order to enhance the national interest of the United Kingdom. Under the direct democracy system embodied in the referendum, the interests of low- and middle-income groups ultimately determine the national interests, so leaving the EU or not participating in the supply of international public goods becomes the final choice of Britain.
【作者单位】：东北师范大学经济学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社科基金项目“双层博弈视角下的国际公共品供给研究:一个理论分析框及应用”(项目编号:17YJC790071) 吉林省科技厅软科学研究项目“经济新常态下吉林省人才流失问题及对策研究”(项目编号:20160418071FG) 东北师范大学校内青年基金项目“吉林省农业转移人口市民化成本与财政转移支付挂钩机制研究”(项目编号:130021620)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D814.1;D871.2;F156.1

【相似文献】