沿海三大城市群产业协作效果评价与比较
发布时间:2018-06-21 10:57
本文选题:城市群 + 专业化 ; 参考:《河北学刊》2017年05期
【摘要】:本文在对都市圈产业分工与协作理论分析的基础上,运用专业化指数、多样化指数以及灰色关联度方法,对京津冀、长三角、珠三角产业协作效果进行评价。结果表明,从产业专业化和多样化看,三大城市群产业协作均呈现出良好的发展态势,珠三角产业协作效果最好,其次是长三角,而京津冀最差;从产业协同发展成熟度看,三大城市群与城市群内不同城市的产业协同发展成熟度各有所长;从各城市群与非农产业的协同关联度看,珠三角和长三角的协同关联度要好于京津冀,而且第三产业对三大城市群产业协作的作用越来越大;从产业协作的综合效率来看,珠三角产业协作的综合效率最高,京津冀次之,长三角最低。为了促进三大城市群的产业协作,须降低行政性交易成本,提升城市群内部各城市间交通通达性,遵循市场规律在更大范围内配置资源。
[Abstract]:Based on the analysis of the theory of industrial division and cooperation in metropolitan area, this paper evaluates the effect of industrial cooperation among Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta by using the methods of specialization index, diversification index and grey correlation degree. The results show that the industrial cooperation of the three urban agglomerations shows a good development trend from the perspective of industrial specialization and diversification. The Pearl River Delta has the best industrial cooperation effect, followed by the Yangtze River Delta, while the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei is the worst. The three urban agglomerations and the different cities in the urban agglomeration have their own maturity of coordinated development, and the degree of synergistic correlation between the three urban agglomerations and non-agricultural industries is better than that between the Pearl River Delta and the Yangtze River Delta, which is better than that between Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei, and between the Pearl River Delta and the Yangtze River Delta. Moreover, the tertiary industry plays a more and more important role in the industrial cooperation among the three urban agglomerations. From the comprehensive efficiency of industrial cooperation, the industrial cooperation efficiency of Pearl River Delta is the highest, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei is the second, and the Yangtze River Delta is the lowest. In order to promote the industrial cooperation among the three urban agglomerations, it is necessary to reduce the administrative transaction cost, enhance the accessibility of the cities within the urban agglomeration, and allocate resources in a larger range according to the market rules.
【作者单位】: 首都经济贸易大学城市经济与公共管理学院;
【基金】:2013年度国家社会科学基金重点项目《都市圈内中小城市功能提升的模式与路径研究》(13AJL014)
【分类号】:F127
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 ;大力推进山海产业协作[J];发展研究;2005年01期
2 李宪建;;加强山海产业协作 促进区域协调发展[J];中国农村小康科技;2007年03期
3 陈新;;价值链视角下闽台产业协作格局的重新审视[J];中共福建省委党校学报;2006年10期
4 张子麟;武建奇;;京津冀地区产业协作存在的问题与发展方向[J];经济与管理;2007年02期
5 韩小蕊;张娟;;京津冀都市圈产业协作发展研究[J];科教文汇(下旬刊);2008年05期
6 蒋宇;;闽宁合作的多元化发展趋势及目前存在的问题[J];农业科学研究;2011年03期
7 黄枝连;;“三跨越发展协作系统”的理论与实践——亚太地区产业协作新模式的探索[J];亚非纵横;1994年03期
8 李罗力,谭刚;香港回归后深港产业协作探讨[J];特区理论与实践;1998年05期
9 陈林;周圣强;;构建广佛都市圈的产业分析——区域产业协作与布局研究[J];科技管理研究;2012年15期
10 肖\,
本文编号:2048370
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/shijiejingjilunwen/2048370.html