多维邻近性对省际边界区域经济协同发展影响的实证分析
[Abstract]:The coordinated development of regional economy is one of the important strategies being implemented in our country under the new normal condition, and the inter-provincial border region is a special region with little influence from the central city and relatively backward economic development. At the same time, it is different from other regions in geographical proximity and cultural identity, which makes it the focal point and difficulty of regional economic coordinated development. Multi-dimensional proximity is the newest angle of view to study the development of regional (innovation), and it is often instructive to study the development of regional economy (innovation). In view of this, this paper tries to analyze the influence factors of the regional economic coordination development of the inter-provincial boundary from the perspective of multidimensional proximity, and establish a model for empirical analysis in order to explain the impact of different proximity on the coordinated development of inter-provincial border regional economy. Furthermore, this paper explores the mechanism of promoting the coordinated development of regional economy at the provincial boundary and higher levels. Firstly, this paper reviews the related research results at home and abroad, and defines the connotation of the coordinated development of regional economy at the provincial border. On this basis, from the perspective of multi-dimensional proximity and general research perspective, this paper analyzes the factors influencing the coordinated development of regional economy in the inter-provincial border area, and establishes an index system accordingly. Based on the relevant data from 1998 to 2013, the regression model is established step by step to analyze the influencing factors of the coordinated economic development of the inter-provincial border regions, which are the middle triangle and the inter-provincial boundary regions with different levels of economic development as the research object, and based on the relevant data from 1998 to 2013, the regression model is established step by step. Through the research, this paper draws the following conclusions: in the two regions, the influence of geographical proximity on the coordinated development of the regional economy of the inter-provincial border shows an inverted "U" shape which is promoted first and then suppressed; Cognitive proximity has a positive effect on the coordinated development of regional economy at the provincial boundary, but there is no over-cognitive proximity at present, and the interaction between geographical proximity and cognitive proximity promotes the coordinated development of regional economy in the inter-provincial boundary. And the interaction is greater than the single proximity effect. The regional knowledge stock promotes the coordinated development of the regional economy, and the degree of the segmentation of the inter-regional market hinders the coordinated development of the regional economy of the inter-provincial boundary. The conclusion is as follows: the interprovincial boundary area of the middle triangle is affected by the single geographical proximity, and the "saturation point" is obviously higher than that of the inter-provincial boundary area of the Yangtze River Delta; There is excessive geographical proximity in the interprovincial boundary area of the Middle Triangle, while the Yangtze River Delta region does not have the suppressive effect of the excessive geographical proximity on the coordinated development of the regional economy for the time being. Cognitive proximity promotes the coordinated development of regional economy in the Yangtze River Delta, but it has little effect on the coordinated development of the regional economy at the inter-provincial boundary of the Middle Triangle. The complementarities between geographical proximity and cognitive proximity in the inter-provincial boundary region of the Yangtze River Delta are obviously stronger than those in the inter-provincial boundary region of the Middle Triangle region. Finally, according to the empirical conclusions, policy recommendations are put forward.
【学位授予单位】:湖南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:F127
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 高建华;;“天高不能皇帝远”——省际边界地区特点辨识[J];中国国情国力;2000年08期
2 贾若祥,侯晓丽;山东省省际边界地区发展研究[J];地域研究与开发;2003年02期
3 朱传耿;王振波;孟召宜;;我国省际边界区域的研究进展及展望[J];经济地理;2007年02期
4 王兴平;;省际边界小城镇整合发展策略研究——以苏皖边界小城镇为例[J];现代城市研究;2008年10期
5 孙久文;;《省际边界区域协调发展研究》简评[J];地理学报;2012年10期
6 翁惠文;开拓省际边界市场刍议[J];农业现代化研究;1988年03期
7 翁惠文;开拓省际边界市场刍议[J];商业经济研究;1988年08期
8 王家进;建立省际边界地区联合互动金融监管机制的思考[J];中国金融;2001年05期
9 王振波;;省际边界区域协调发展的理论初探[J];中国乡镇企业;2009年01期
10 尚正永;白永平;张小林;钟业喜;;丘陵山地省际边界区域协调发展研究——以粤闽湘赣边界区域为例[J];山地学报;2010年05期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 翟河贵;;《省际边界区域经济理论与实践》:开启省际边界经济发展大门的钥匙[A];贵州省写作学会2010年遵义县学术年会论文集[C];2010年
2 王振波;朱传耿;徐建刚;;省际边界区域边界效应的测定——以淮海经济区为例[A];中国地理学会2007年学术年会论文摘要集[C];2007年
3 陈祖军;张海燕;徐贵泉;张新;;省际边界湖泊蓝藻防治联合治污机制的研究——以淀山湖蓝藻防治为例[A];首届中国湖泊论坛论文集[C];2011年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 高永安邋张金宝;山东:公路治理开启省际边界“经济锁”[N];中国交通报;2007年
2 陶通坪 吴增朝 本报记者 龙金毓;湘黔边界看和谐[N];经济信息时报;2006年
3 蒋平华 全州县委常委、政法委书记;加强交流合作 调防结合 努力维护边界和谐稳定[N];法治快报;2009年
4 记者 杨蕾;省际边界扶贫开发调研组莅潮调研[N];潮州日报;2010年
5 通讯员 刘小林 曹雄清 华军平;汝城睦邻活动奏响省际边界和谐曲[N];郴州日报;2008年
6 ;如何健全省际边界联防联调机制[N];人民公安报;2014年
7 刘玉洪 程长春;赣榆:跨省携手激活“边界经济”[N];新华日报;2009年
8 记者 崔威 通讯员 吴远娟 李通;赣榆深化省际边界司法行政合作[N];连云港日报;2010年
9 记者 吕建华;湘桂携手筑民族团结长廊[N];法治快报;2010年
10 中南民族大学 李俊杰;浅谈省际边界民族地区经济协同发展[N];光明日报;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前8条
1 曾巍;多维邻近性对省际边界区域经济协同发展影响的实证分析[D];湖南大学;2016年
2 刘奥东;省际边界中心城市发展研究[D];湖南师范大学;2011年
3 陈敏;省际边界区对抗性利益关系及其协调发展研究[D];江苏师范大学;2012年
4 谷国领;邯郸构建晋冀鲁豫省际边界区中心城市的研究[D];辽宁师范大学;2011年
5 王娜;边界与边缘[D];西南大学;2012年
6 张向敏;省际边界区域城市化与经济协调发展研究[D];华中师范大学;2012年
7 王璐;省际边界区域的景观效应[D];湖北工业大学;2012年
8 骆泽顺;省际边界地区旅游合作开发研究[D];广东商学院;2012年
,本文编号:2206177
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/shijiejingjilunwen/2206177.html