比较企业优势观视角下后发企业追赶路径研究——以新能源汽车发展引发的范式转换为背景

发布时间：2018-05-26 17:05

本文选题：后发企业 + 追赶路径　；参考：《科学学研究》2017年01期

【摘要】：面对范式转换开启的机会窗口和随之而来的高不确定性,后发者选择何种追赶路径更有可能赶超领先者?为回答这一问题,以新能源汽车发展引发的范式转换为背景,选取了我国市场上典型的汽车企业案例;然后,以比较企业优势观为理论基础,将新、旧范式下的技术和产品以及领先企业和后发企业纳入模型,经过研究辨识出三类追赶路径:渐进式、突进式和混合式。这些路径在实施方式、对企业具有比较企业优势和竞争优势的要求以及影响追赶成败的关键因素等方面均不相同。目前,我国企业实施的主要是渐进式和突进式追赶,然而,混合式追赶路径也应该成为我国企业,特别是大型国企的一个未来选择。
[Abstract]:In the face of the window of opportunity opened by paradigm shift and the high uncertainty associated with it, what kind of catch-up path are the latecomers more likely to catch up with the leaders? In order to answer this question, taking the paradigm shift caused by the development of new energy vehicles as the background, this paper selects the typical automobile enterprises in the market of our country as a case, and then, based on the theory of comparative enterprise advantage, The technologies and products under the old paradigm, as well as the leading firms and the latecomer firms, are incorporated into the model, and three kinds of catch-up paths are identified: progressive, abrupt and hybrid. These paths are different in the way of implementation, the requirements of comparative and competitive advantages for enterprises, and the key factors affecting the success or failure of catching up. At present, the enterprises in our country mainly carry out progressive and sudden catch-up. However, the hybrid pursuit path should also become a future choice for Chinese enterprises, especially large state-owned enterprises.
【作者单位】：天津理工大学国际工商学院;
【基金】：天津市科技发展战略研究计划项目(13ZLZLZF06100)
【分类号】：F273.1

【相似文献】