效果推理理论视角下企业创新与绩效提升机制研究

发布时间：2018-06-04 05:20

本文选题：效果推理 + 因果推理　；参考：《科学学与科学技术管理》2017年09期

【摘要】：在不确定环境下,当难以甚至无法预测未来科技和市场将如何变化的时候,如何开展产品和服务创新?通过将效果推理理论拓展至在位企业,分析效果推理和因果逻辑对于探索式创新以及开发式创新的影响,同时考察探索式创新和开发式创新对于企业绩效提升的作用。利用183份调查问卷的结构方程模型实证研究发现:效果推理的先前承诺和实验原则以及因果推理对探索式创新有显著的正向影响,而效果推理的可承受损失原则对探索式创新有显著的负向影响;对于开发式创新,因果推理有显著的正向影响,而效果推理没有显著的影响;探索式创新和开发式创新对于企业绩效都有显著的正向影响。实证研究结果说明在探索式创新中,决策者混合运用效果推理和因果推理逻辑,而在开发式创新中则主要运用因果推理逻辑。
[Abstract]:How to innovate products and services in uncertain environments when it is difficult or even impossible to predict how technology and markets will change in the future? By extending the theory of effect reasoning to incumbent enterprises, this paper analyzes the effect of effect reasoning and causality logic on exploratory innovation and development-oriented innovation, and examines the effect of exploratory innovation and development-oriented innovation on the improvement of enterprise performance. Based on the structural equation model of 183 questionnaires, it is found that previous commitment and experimental principles of effect reasoning and causal reasoning have significant positive effects on exploratory innovation. The principle of tolerance loss of effect reasoning has a significant negative impact on exploratory innovation, while for development innovation, causal reasoning has a significant positive effect, but effect reasoning has no significant effect. Both exploratory innovation and development innovation have significant positive effects on enterprise performance. The empirical results show that in exploratory innovation, decision-makers use effect reasoning and causal reasoning logic, while in development-oriented innovation they mainly use causal reasoning logic.
【作者单位】：南开大学商学院;天津大学教育学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金项目(71532005,71602141) 天津市哲学社会科学基金项目(TJGL13-006)
【分类号】：F272.5;F273.1

【相似文献】