深圳市城市化进程中的原小产权房困境研究
发布时间:2018-01-31 23:17
本文关键词: 困境 城市化 小产权房 深圳市 出处:《华南理工大学》2013年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:随着我国经济的发展,农村城市化正成为社会结构变迁的一种表现形式,城市化离不开土地的开发利用。我国现行的土地制度是城乡二元制,土地分为国家所有和农村集体所有,但城市开发和建设只能利用国有土地,在这一制度逻辑下,农村集体用地不能用于城市开发和利用,建设在农村集体土地的城市工商业用房及住宅得不到国家发证确权,俗称小产权房。一方面,国家严禁小产权房的建造和销售,另一方面却是民间小产权房市场的购销两旺。小产权房成为政府亟需解决的难题。 深圳从一个渔村发展成经济特区,正是农村城市化的一个标本,不可避免地出现小产权房问题。深圳经历的农村城市化,是所谓农村集体用地概括国有化的过程,政府通过取消农业户口,撤消农村集体经济组织建制,建立社区居委会等方式推进城市化,并将城市化后属于农民集体经济组织的土地直接宣布为国家所有。这一做法绕过了集体土地经征收转为国有用地的土地征用制度,改变了行政区域的土地性质,却难以改变深圳原农村小产权房蓬勃发展的状况。随着深圳城市化及特区一体化进程的深入,土地资源日益短缺与城市发展用地需求激增之间的矛盾进一步加剧,为释放现有土地资源,必须处理占用原集体现国有土地的小产权房。2009年5月21日,深圳市出台《关于农村城市化历史遗留违法建筑的处理决定》,启动了对小产权房的处理程序,然而三年多过去了,政府只完成了数据普查工作,小产权房的处理问题却悬而未决。针对于此,本文试图从小产权房产生原因、困境根源、现行土地制度分析着手,,结合深圳小产权房现状及政府监管政策,基于“产权清晰、权责明确、要素流通、市场导向、政府监管”的目标导向,从社会稳定、法律正义、市场经济的角度提出解决深圳小产权房困境问题的建议。
[Abstract]:With the development of our economy, rural urbanization is becoming a form of social structure change, urbanization can not be separated from the development and utilization of land. The current land system of our country is urban-rural dual system. Land is divided into national ownership and rural collective ownership, but urban development and construction can only use state-owned land, in this system logic, rural collective land can not be used for urban development and utilization. Construction in the rural collective land of urban industrial and commercial housing and housing can not obtain the right to state certification, commonly known as small property rights. On the one hand, the state strictly prohibits the construction and sale of small property houses. On the other hand, the purchase and sale of private small property house is booming. Small property house has become a difficult problem that the government needs to solve. The development of Shenzhen from a fishing village to a special economic zone is a specimen of rural urbanization, which inevitably leads to the problem of small property rights. It is the process of nationalization of rural collective land. The government promotes urbanization by canceling agricultural hukou canceling rural collective economic organization and establishing community neighborhood committee. After urbanization, the land belonging to farmers' collective economic organizations is declared to be owned by the state directly. This practice bypasses the land expropriation system of collective land expropriation into state-owned land, and changes the land nature of administrative regions. However, it is difficult to change the booming situation of the small property houses in the former rural areas of Shenzhen. With the deepening of the process of urbanization and integration of the special zone in Shenzhen. The contradiction between the increasing shortage of land resources and the sharp increase in the demand for land for urban development is further aggravated in order to release the existing land resources. It is necessary to deal with the small property right houses that occupy the original set of state-owned land. On May 21st 2009, Shenzhen issued a decision on the disposal of illegal buildings left over from the history of rural urbanization. Started to deal with the small property house procedures, but more than three years have passed, the government has only completed the data census work, the small property house processing problem is still unresolved. In view of this, this article attempts to produce the reason from the small property house. The root of the predicament, the current land system analysis, combined with the current situation of small property rights in Shenzhen and government regulatory policies, based on "clear property rights, clear rights and responsibilities, the circulation of elements, market guidance, government supervision" goal orientation. From the angle of social stability, legal justice and market economy, the paper puts forward some suggestions to solve the dilemma of Shenzhen small property house.
【学位授予单位】:华南理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:F299.23
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张清勇;;住房、住房问题与住房政策:一个综述[J];财贸经济;2008年01期
2 张占录;;以土地发展权合理配置解决小产权房问题[J];城乡建设;2009年07期
3 汪杨;;改革“小产权房”的制度经济学分析[J];财经政法资讯;2010年03期
4 鲁晓明;;论小产权房流转——原罪的形成与应然法的选择[J];法学杂志;2010年05期
5 刘国臻;;论我国土地发展权的法律性质[J];法学杂志;2011年03期
6 张曙光;;城市化背景下土地产权的实施和保护[J];管理世界;2007年12期
7 王媛;;土地资本化、城市化与城市经济增长——深圳土地制度改革的意义[J];中国房地产;2012年19期
8 刘芳;赵新平;岳隽;;快速城市化背景下原农村集体留用地的产权经济学分析——以深圳为例[J];广东土地科学;2011年04期
9 郭清根;;“小产权房”现象中政府职能缺失和处置对策[J];河南社会科学;2008年05期
10 许海燕;梅昀;张汉江;;利益博弈视角下小产权房的经济学思考[J];经济体制改革;2008年05期
本文编号:1480255
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/zbyz/1480255.html