票据无因性适用范围分析

发布时间：2018-03-05 21:24

本文选题：票据行为　切入点：票据理论　出处：《兰州大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：票据的无因性也称为抽象性,与民法中的无因性相比,票据无因性有着自身的特点,表现在内涵和外延两个方面。票据的理论在发展中总的来说可以分为一元论和二元论,在一元论中主要是交付契约论、发行说、创造说,而作为弥补一元论理论缺陷的权利外观说并非一种独立的票据理论,更多的是一种辅助的手段。二元论则是指票据行为二阶段理论,一元论和二元论两者的区别在于对票据行为的构成的阶段性认识上的差异,二元论下票据行为分为票据债务承担行为和票据债权移转行为。二元论在比较了一元论中各理论的优势和缺陷基础上,充分研究了票据行为中的有因行为和无因行为,并作出了区别。票据无因性是票据的核心,其具有自身的独立价值,在内容上,各票据理论有着不同的观点。以往理论下的对于抗辩的限制主要表现在对权利外观理论的借用。而票据行为二阶段理论在区分了票据行为各阶段的构成要件基础上,进一步细化了对于票据抗辩的限制制度。因此,作为票据无因性的表现,票据抗辩制度将作为本文的核心内容。本文一共分为四章,在第一章介绍了票据无因性的相关理论,为全文行文做铺垫。第二章论述了本文所采用的理论基础——票据行为二阶段理论对于票据无因性适用范围的影响。通过解释该理论的主要容和构成要件,为阐述后续内容进一步打好基础。第三章通过对传统理论的反思,阐述了笔者在本文中·的一个核心观点,并由此建立了文章的理论基础。第四章类似于总结部分,对于现行的有关法条进行了深入分析,提出笔者的建议。同时对票据抗辩制度进行了综合性的论述,是全文最为重要的部分。全文通过对票据无因性的相关理论进行比较分析,从而确立了对于票据无因性与票据抗辩制度之间关系的基本观点,在此基础之上得出全文的结论。
[Abstract]:Compared with the non-causality in civil law, it has its own characteristics, which are manifested in its connotation and extension. In general, the theory of bill can be divided into monism and dualism in general. In monism, it is mainly the theory of delivery contract, the theory of distribution, the theory of creation, and the theory of right appearance as a remedy for the defects of monism is not an independent theory of instruments. Dualism refers to the two-stage theory of bill behavior. The difference between monism and dualism lies in the difference in the stage understanding of the composition of bill behavior. On the basis of comparing the advantages and disadvantages of various theories in monism, dualism fully studies the causative behavior and the non-cause behavior in the bill behavior. And made a distinction. Bill without cause is the core of bill, it has its own independent value, in content, Different theories of bill have different views. In the past, the limitation of defense is mainly manifested in the borrowing of the theory of the appearance of rights, while the two-stage theory of bill behavior distinguishes the constituent elements of each stage of the act of bill. It further refines the restriction system of the bill defense. Therefore, as the performance of the bill without cause, the bill defense system will be the core content of this paper. This paper is divided into four chapters. In the first chapter, the paper introduces the related theory of the non-causality of the bill and paves the way for the full text. The second chapter discusses the influence of the two-stage theory of bill behavior on the scope of application of the bill, which is the theoretical foundation adopted in this paper. By explaining the main contents and the constitutive requirements of the theory, it lays a good foundation for the further elaboration of the following contents. In the third chapter, through the reflection of the traditional theory, the author expounds a core point of view in this paper, and establishes the theoretical basis of the article. Chapter 4th is similar to the summary part. It makes a thorough analysis of the current relevant articles of law and puts forward the author's suggestions. At the same time, it makes a comprehensive discussion on the bill defense system, which is the most important part of the paper. Based on the comparative analysis of the relevant theories of the non-causality of the bill, this paper establishes the basic viewpoint of the relationship between the non-causality of the bill and the defense system of the bill, and draws the conclusion of the full text on this basis.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D922.287

【参考文献】