票据相对无因性研究
发布时间:2018-06-10 02:00
本文选题:票据 + 相对无因性 ; 参考:《兰州大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:票据是最早产生、最典型的有价证券,它在加快商品交换速度、加强商业信用、加速资金周转方面发挥着重要作用。随着世界各国市场经济的不断向前发展,人们对各种交易的便捷性和安全性提出了更高的要求,而票据通过票据无因性赋予的超强流通性满足了人们的这一迫切需求,极大地促进了社会经济的发展。可见,票据无因性对票据的自由流通起着至关重要的作用。基于此,世界各国都相继承认票据的无因性,将其作为票据法的一项根本原则贯彻到自己的票据制度中,并在实施后取得了很好的效果,有力地推动了本国经济的发展。票据无因性已成为现代票据制度的基础。 然而在我国,不仅在票据无因性的理论研究方面还存有争议,而且在票据无因性制度规范方面也不甚明晰。造成这一现象的主要原因:一是对票据无因性的理论研究不够,导致认识存有差异,而这种认识的差异使我国票据无因性制度的建构缺乏扎实的理论基础;二是我国尚处于经济转型期,很多制度层面的改革还不够彻底,仍趋于保守,造成了我国票据法对票据无因性的规定模棱两可、自相矛盾。票据无因性制度的不完善给票据的自由流通带来极大障碍,限制了票据充分发挥其各项功能,从一定程度上阻碍了我国经济的发展。 正是在我国目前这种情况下,对于票据无因性制度的研究就显得尤为必要。本文通过对票据无因性概念的重新阐释、对票据无因性制度的基础和制度基本内容的分析,在理论上进一步深化了对票据无因性的认识,重构了票据无因性理论的主要内容,为票据无因性制度的研究夯实了基础。通过考察国外票据无因性的立法,进行制度比较分析,使视野更加开阔,为我国票据无因性制度的完善提供了有益的参考。在重构票据无因性理论、考察国外票据无因性立法、分析我国票据无因性制度主要问题的基础上,提出完善我国票据无因性制度的个人建议。
[Abstract]:Bill is the earliest and most typical securities, which plays an important role in accelerating the speed of commodity exchange, strengthening commercial credit and speeding up the turnover of funds. With the continuous development of the market economy in the world, people put forward higher requirements for the convenience and security of all kinds of transactions. It has greatly promoted the development of social economy. It can be seen that the non-causality of bills plays a vital role in the free circulation of bills. Based on this, every country in the world has recognized the non-causality of the bill one after another, implemented it as a fundamental principle of the instrument law into its own bill system, and has achieved good results after its implementation, which has promoted the development of its own economy. The non-causality of bills has become the basis of the modern bill system, but in our country, there are not only disputes in the theoretical research of the non-causality of the bill, but also lack of clarity in the regulation of the system of the non-causality of the bill. The main reasons for this phenomenon are as follows: first, the theoretical research on the uncausality of bills is not enough, which leads to the difference of cognition, which makes the construction of the system of the non-causality of bills in our country lack a solid theoretical foundation; Second, our country is still in the economic transition period, many system level reform is not enough thorough, still tends to be conservative, has caused our country negotiable instrument law to the bill without cause the stipulation is ambiguous, contradictory. The imperfection of the system of non-causality of bill brings great obstacle to the free circulation of bill, limits the bill to give full play to its various functions, and to a certain extent hinders the development of our country's economy. It is particularly necessary to study the system of bills without cause. Through the reinterpretation of the concept of the non-causality of the bill, the analysis of the foundation and the basic contents of the system, the paper further deepens the understanding of the non-causality of the bill in theory, and reconstructs the main content of the theory of the non-causality of the bill. It lays a solid foundation for the research of the system of bill uncausality. By investigating the legislation of the non-causality of foreign bills and making a comparative analysis of the system, the author makes a wider view and provides a useful reference for the perfection of the system of the non-causality of bills in our country. On the basis of reconstructing the theory of non-causality of bills, investigating the legislation of non-causality in foreign countries, and analyzing the main problems of the system of non-causality of bills in China, the author puts forward some personal suggestions on how to perfect the system of non-causality of bills in China.
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D922.287
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 董惠江;关于票据抗辩限制的新思考[J];比较法研究;2003年06期
2 郭敏;;票据的无因性[J];福建法学;1999年02期
3 夏林林;对票据无因性原则法律适用的思考[J];法律适用;2004年01期
4 郭泽华;应坚持票据行为的无因性──兼评我国票据法[J];法学杂志;1997年01期
5 张奇;;从票据无因性看我国《票据法》的缺憾[J];法制与经济(下旬刊);2008年10期
6 李幼明,宋志国;对我国票据立法中无因性限制的探讨[J];中央政法管理干部学院学报;2000年01期
7 蒋大兴;《票据法》的立法缺陷及其完善[J];河北法学;1996年04期
8 段卫华,胡海涛;票据无因性原则之理论探讨及其立法完善[J];河北法学;2005年09期
9 汪世虎;论票据行为的无因性[J];海南大学学报(人文社会科学版);2003年03期
10 汪丁丁;回顾“金融革命”[J];经济研究;1997年12期
,本文编号:2001583
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/zbyz/2001583.html