遗嘱信托论
发布时间:2018-06-25 07:08
本文选题:遗嘱信托 + 受托人 ; 参考:《郑州大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:随着我国经济的快速发展,国民个人财富及家庭财富迅速增加,我国已经具备了发展遗嘱信托的经济基础。2001年4月全国人大常委会通过了《中华人民共和国信托法》,这是我国大陆地区关于调整信托活动的首部专门立法,为我国遗嘱信托的发展奠定了法律基础。但是此项立法主要集中于对商业信托的规定,对遗嘱信托缺乏详细规定,甚至在某些地方还相互抵触。随着中国现代化进程的展开,在处理遗产的问题上,越来越多的人开始关注遗嘱信托制度。在这种背景下,构建我国的遗嘱信托制度显得尤为紧迫和必要。 要在我国发展遗嘱信托事业,必须首先构建体系完整、规则明确的法律制度,而这正是本文研究的主要内容——包括我国遗嘱信托制度,就必须研究遗嘱信托的概念,遗嘱信托的法律特征,遗嘱信托中的各方主体,遗嘱信托财产,遗嘱信托的成立和生效要件,遗嘱信托的监管,遗嘱信托的变更以及终止等。 本文共分为四个部分: 第一部分:遗嘱信托概述。遗嘱信托制度是英美法系的舶来品,在该部分中主要介绍遗嘱信托制度起源、概念和法律特征,遗嘱信托除具有一般信托的特征以外,还有独有的特征:遗嘱信托体现遗嘱自由和财产处分自由;遗嘱信托是公开化的继承。 第二部分:遗嘱信托中的主体和客体。遗嘱信托中的主体指遗嘱信托的委托人、受托人及受益人,遗嘱信托中的客体主要指遗嘱信托财产。本部分主要研究委托人的资格;受托人的资格和职责;受托人的选任以及职责终止;受益人的资格、权利和义务;遗嘱信托财产。 第三部分:遗嘱信托制度的运行。该部分主要用比较法的研究方法对比英美法系和大陆法系在遗嘱信托运行中的不同规定,包括遗嘱信托设立的条件;遗嘱信托的成立与生效要件;遗嘱信托的变更;遗嘱信托的监管;遗嘱信托的终止事由和法律后果。 第四部分:我国遗嘱信托制度的构建。该部分主要为构建我国遗嘱信托制度法律框架,并对一些重点问题提出建议。
[Abstract]:With the rapid economic development of our country, the national personal wealth and family wealth are increasing rapidly. China already has the economic basis for developing testamentary trusts. In April 2001, the standing Committee of the National people's Congress adopted the Trust Law of the people's Republic of China, which is the first special legislation on the adjustment of trust activities in mainland China. It lays a legal foundation for the development of testamentary trust in our country. However, the legislation mainly focuses on the regulation of commercial trust, lack of detailed regulations on testamentary trust, and even conflicts with each other in some places. With the development of China's modernization, more and more people begin to pay attention to the testamentary trust system. In this context, the construction of our testamentary trust system is particularly urgent and necessary. In order to develop testamentary trust in China, we must first construct a legal system with complete system and clear rules, and this is the main content of this paper-including the testamentary trust system in China, we must study the concept of testamentary trust. The legal characteristics of testamentary trust, the subjects of testamentary trust, the property of testamentary trust, the establishment and effectual requirements of testamentary trust, the supervision of testamentary trust, the alteration and termination of testamentary trust, etc. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part: an overview of testamentary trust. Testamentary trust system is an import of Anglo-American law system. In this part, it mainly introduces the origin, concept and legal characteristics of testamentary trust system. There are also unique features: testamentary trust embodies freedom of will and disposition of property; testamentary trust is open inheritance. The second part: the subject and object of testamentary trust. The subject of testamentary trust refers to the trustee, trustee and beneficiary of testamentary trust, and the object of testamentary trust mainly refers to testamentary trust property. This part mainly studies the qualifications of the principal, the qualifications and duties of the trustee, the appointment and termination of the trustee, the qualifications, rights and obligations of the beneficiary, and the testamentary trust property. The third part: the operation of testamentary trust system. This part mainly compares the different provisions of Anglo-American law system and civil law system in the operation of testamentary trust, including the conditions for the establishment of testamentary trust, the establishment and effective requirements of testamentary trust, the change of testamentary trust; Supervision of testamentary trusts; termination of testamentary trusts and legal consequences. Part IV: the construction of testamentary trust system in China. The main purpose of this part is to construct the legal framework of testamentary trust system in China, and put forward some suggestions on some key issues.
【学位授予单位】:郑州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D922.282;D923.5
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈碰有;;英国遗嘱继承制度研究[J];厦门大学法律评论;2001年02期
2 张里安;符琪;;论违反信托义务的民事责任[J];法学评论;2006年03期
3 江平;信托制度在中国的应用前景[J];法学;2005年01期
4 王连洲;中国信托制度发展的困境与出路[J];法学;2005年01期
5 夏斌;发展中国统一信托市场的两大问题[J];法学;2005年01期
6 谢育敏;质疑“夫妻忠实义务”[J];赣南医学院学报;2004年06期
7 董新忠;;试论信托受托人谨慎义务的标准[J];中北大学学报(社会科学版);2007年01期
8 孙毅;;论遗嘱方式的缓和主义进路——以《继承法》修改的相关理念变革为中心[J];求是学刊;2012年04期
9 温世扬,冯兴俊;论信托财产所有权——兼论我国相关立法的完善[J];武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年02期
10 盛学军;中国信托立法缺陷及其对信托功能的消解[J];现代法学;2003年06期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 张劲松;遗嘱信托制度研究[D];黑龙江大学;2010年
2 方惠玲;论信托制度下受托人信义义务[D];中南民族大学;2012年
,本文编号:2065099
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/zbyz/2065099.html