证券民事赔偿基金制度研究
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, China's securities market has been greatly developed, to a great extent, stimulated the development of China's socialist market economy, related economic laws and regulations are gradually improving and perfected, the capital market is gradually prosperous. But there are still many drawbacks in the protection of the interests of investors, China has been investing. The relevant system of investor protection emphasizes administrative responsibility and criminal responsibility, but neglects civil liability, which makes it difficult for investors to get effective compensation after their investment interests are damaged, and some investors do not know their interests are damaged, let alone claim, even if they know their investment interests are damaged, the process of claim is also very difficult. It is a long time and the cost of safeguarding rights is quite high. Under such circumstances, some investors even give up their rights and interests directly. As a result, their investment confidence is greatly damaged. Degree.
With the continuous development of global economic integration, that is, securities trading internationalization, securities issuance internationalization, securities system internationalization, securities market internationalization and capital internationalization, a country in the capital market can no longer be self-confident, blindly closed, we must pay attention to all developments in the international capital market. Securities laws and regulations at home and abroad mostly prescribe the civil compensation fund system for securities transactions as an important system. In western countries, what frightens lawbreakers is civil compensation rather than administrative fines and criminal liability. Civil liability is a kind of low-cost monitoring measure, and only those who break the law without the ability to pay are given imprisonment and other punishments. Under the condition of financial market integration, the international coordination of investor protection has important reference significance, so the establishment of this system is multi-functional and long-term. Of course, the establishment and improvement of this system is not achieved overnight, but a systematic project, which needs the cooperation and joint efforts of all aspects.
In this paper, the establishment and improvement of the securities civil compensation fund system, focusing on how the fund system to operate, therefore, the object of compensation, the review of compensation and compensation procedures to build a specific discussion, put forward relevant suggestions and solutions; and then from the level of law and economics of specific analysis By analyzing the economic attributes of the securities civil compensation fund system, we can have a deep understanding of the characteristics of the securities civil compensation fund system from the perspective of law and economics; the article recognizes that the key to the perfection of the fund system lies in the implementation of the fund system, and puts forward some relevant suggestions for safeguards. The establishment and improvement of China's securities civil compensation fund system is a great safeguard for the development of China's capital market, the interests of investors are safeguarded, and confidence in the capital market will naturally be reversed, so that investors will be able to. In addition, the securities investor compensation fund system can not solve all the problems of investor protection. The protection of investors'rights and interests also depends on the self-protection of investors, industry self-discipline and the perfection of government supervision system and other systems. This article only discusses how to protect the interests of investors from the establishment and improvement of the securities civil compensation fund system, as well as other aspects of the system is worth exploring.
【学位授予单位】:江西财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D922.287;D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 步淑段;安晓红;任万林;;我国证券民事赔偿综合保障体系构建[J];财会月刊;2008年08期
2 庄淑珍,董天夫;我国代表人诉讼制度与美国集团诉讼制度的比较研究[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);1996年02期
3 徐志辉;;2009年中国证券法理论研究综述[J];公司法律评论;2010年00期
4 李若山 ,覃东 ,周莉珠 ,祁新娥;新《会计法》实施情况的问卷调查分析[J];会计研究;2002年04期
5 秦江萍;;上市公司会计舞弊:国外相关研究综述与启示[J];会计研究;2005年06期
6 刘远;贾健;;经济犯罪刑罚结构调整的刑事政策思考[J];山东警察学院学报;2010年04期
7 刘明辉;王恩山;;我国审计需求的异化及制度成因[J];审计与经济研究;2011年04期
8 汤洁茵;;证券投资基金纳税主体资格的法律确证[J];税务与经济;2008年06期
9 邱志珊;;我国证券市场中机构投资者发展非均衡的制度分析[J];时代金融;2010年02期
10 傅浩;证券投资者赔偿制度国际比较研究[J];证券市场导报;2002年01期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 方桂荣;投资基金监管法律制度研究[D];重庆大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 李瑞红;论我国证券投资基金持有人利益的保护[D];郑州大学;2011年
2 王波;论证券市场虚假陈述的民事责任[D];中国政法大学;2003年
3 刘玉萍;证券欺诈民事责任的问题研究[D];北方工业大学;2006年
4 易秋彬;论我国证券投资者保护基金的建立[D];华东师范大学;2006年
5 钱明;中国证券市场信用问题研究[D];苏州大学;2006年
6 谢栋;我国证券投资者保护基金的法律问题研究[D];对外经济贸易大学;2007年
7 孙卫国;中国证券投资者保护基金法律制度研究[D];吉林大学;2007年
8 刘森;证券投资者赔偿法律制度研究[D];四川大学;2007年
9 莫颖;我国证券公司退出制度法律研究[D];湖南大学;2007年
10 王晓辉;证券投资者保护基金法律制度研究[D];东北财经大学;2007年
本文编号:2242758
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/zbyz/2242758.html